ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
The Combination Strategy of the Drainage and Resection under the Microendoscope for Giant Discal Cyst: A Case Report.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Discal cysts have been reported as intraspinal extradural cysts connected with corresponding intervertebral discs. The resection of the discal cyst has illustrated the good result. However, we report a much larger discal cyst, which was seemed to be difficult to resect all of them under the microendoscope safety. Case Report: A 21-year-old man had experienced pain in the right lower limb for at least a month and was diagnosed with radiculopathy of the right S1 nerve root. Magnetic resonance image showed that mild disc degeneration and cyst at L5/S1, which was measured 12.0 mm on the sagittal view, accounted for 71.1% of the sagittal diameter of the spinal canal. He underwent hemi-flavectomy and the resection of the cyst under the microendoscope. During surgery, we found that there was not enough space in the epidural to remove the cyst safety without the laminectomy. The right S1 nerve root was strongly pushed to the dorsal side, adhered, and stretched by the cyst. First, we have tried to drain the liquid context of the cyst and decrease the volume to make the enough epidural space to perform the surgical procedure safety. Second, we resected the wall, which procedure made the nerve root loosen. Conclusion: The combination of the drainage and resection under the microendoscope has ability to secure the enough working space, prevent the nerve root injury, and minimize the surgical invasion. This strategy can expand the surgical indication for the larger cystic lesion, which have been performed by the open surgery so far.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.