Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351595›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Examining the impact of total rewards on proactivity among Chinese knowledge employees: the moderating role of vertical and horizontal collectivist orientations.

Jie Zhou, Junqing Yang, Bonoua Faye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jie ZhouSchool of Business Administration, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan, China.
Junqing YangSchool of Business Administration, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan, China.
Bonoua FayeSchool of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In practice, the phenomenon of employees "lying flat"-characterized by poor proactive behavior-reflects a failure in the organization's compensation incentive policy. Currently, the most effective compensation practice is total rewards, yet previous research seems to overlook the impact of total rewards (TR) on proactivity and has not considered when its effects may vary across different forms of proactive behavior. Methods: Based on social exchange theory and role theory, this study uses hierarchical regression and self-help methods to conduct a two-wave survey of the new generation of Chinese knowledge employees ( Results: The results show that total rewards significantly enhance both individual task proactivity and team member proactivity, with a greater positive effect on the former. Additionally, the study finds that vertical collectivism orientation weakens the total rewards-individual task proactivity relationship, while horizontal collectivism orientation weakens the total rewards-team member proactivity relationship. Surprisingly, the study does not support a positive moderating effect of vertical collectivism orientation on total rewards-team member proactivity or horizontal collectivism orientation on total rewards-individual task proactivity. Discussion: Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the effectiveness of compensation practices through the lens of intracultural heterogeneity and provide valuable insights for managers seeking to foster various forms of proactivity among the new generation of knowledge employees.

Indexed as

cultural orientationshorizontal collectivismindividual task proactivityteam member proactivitytotal rewardsvertical collectivism

Identifiers

PMID40351595
PMCPMC12062181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.