Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351593›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

If not police, then who? Building a new workforce for community behavioral health crisis response.

Amy C Watson, Kellan McNally, Leah G Pope, Michael T Compton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amy C WatsonSchool of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Kellan McNallySchool of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Leah G PopeNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.
Michael T ComptonNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Communities across the United States and elsewhere are working to implement alternatives to law enforcement as primary responders to behavioral health crises. These efforts can only be successful if there is a skilled workforce prepared to take on this role. We argue that this workforce must be developed, and propose a new, credentialed Community Behavioral Health Crisis Responder (CBHCR) role. Methods: Guided by a 13-member advisory board with expertise across behavioral health, crisis services, and law enforcement, we conducted a literature review, key informant interviews, and focus groups to identify the foundational values, competencies, and skills for this proposed role. Results: Interview and focus group participants discussed desired characteristics of CBHCRs and emphasized values such as cultural humility, a nonjudgmental approach, and the importance of lived experience broadly defined. Competencies and skills included engagement and communication strategies that enhance safety and trust, suicide prevention, conflict resolution, and situational awareness. Participants highlighted the need to train CBHCRs to provide compassionate, trauma-informed crisis intervention, de-escalation, support, and connection to needed resources. In conjunction with our advisory board and external experts, we used the findings to iteratively refine the values, competencies, and skills of CBHCRs. Discussion: We discuss the next steps in creating this new, skilled and credentialed crisis response workforce.

Indexed as

911 diversionalternative responsebehavioral health crisiscommunity responsemobile crisis interventionworkforce development

Identifiers

PMID40351593
PMCPMC12061887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.