ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Violent or competitive? Unpacking adolescent cyber-aggressive behavior in text, video, and game context.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The relationship between video game use, antisocial behaviour, and bullying in adolescents and young adults, and gender differences.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- The impact of negative life events on aggressive behavior in college students: the mediating role of anger rumination and hostile attribution bias.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cyber-aggressive behavior in adolescents is significantly influenced by violence and competition, yet their distinct roles and interactions with contextual and personality factors remain underexplored. This study investigates how violent versus competitive triggers, contextual mediums (text, video, game), and social comparison tendencies shape cyber-aggression. Methods: Two experimental studies were conducted. Study 1 employed a 2 (violence vs. competition) × 3 (context: text, video, game) mixed design using gamified assessments to measure cyber-aggression. Study 2 expanded this with a 2 (violence vs. competition) × 3 (social comparison tendency: high/medium/low) × 2 (aggression type: verbal/physical) design to dissect behavioral and personality interactions. Results: Violence consistently elicited higher cyber-aggression than competition across all contexts (Study 1). In Study 2, violent-competitive factors retained significant main effects, while aggression type (verbal/physical) and social comparison tendency alone showed no significant impacts. Key interactions emerged: verbal aggression under competitive conditions provoked stronger cyber-aggression than physical means. High social comparison tendency amplified cyber-aggression in violent contexts, correlating with escalating violence intensity. Discussion: Violence is the dominant driver of adolescent cyber-aggression, particularly when paired with high social comparison tendencies. Competitive environments, however, disproportionately trigger verbal aggression. These findings highlight the need for context-specific interventions targeting media content and individual predispositions to mitigate cyber-aggressive behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.