ArticleThe Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon reports2025
A Case Report of Fenestration Deformity of Extracranial Vertebral Artery and Literature Review.
Article in The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vertebral artery fenestration (VAF) is a rare anatomical variation of the vertebral artery that may affect the safety of clinical surgeries and interventional treatments. Although ultrasound is widely used to assess neck vessels, its application in diagnosing VAF has not been extensively investigated. Case Description: This article reports a case of an 82-year-old male patient who was diagnosed with VAF following a neck vessel ultrasound examination prompted by poor blood sugar control. The ultrasound revealed an abnormal course of the left vertebral artery, leading to the diagnosis of VAF. Conclusion: Ultrasound, with its noninvasive nature and real-time imaging capabilities, is a valuable initial screening tool for diagnosing VAF. Despite its limitations, its ability to identify vascular anomalies such as VAF highlights its critical role in early detection, potentially improving patient outcomes and guiding clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.