Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351550›Full record

ArticleLandscape ecology2025

Land-use impacts on crop yield: direct and indirect roles of arthropods and associated ecosystem services in European farmland.

Roman Bucher, Péter Batáry, Julia Baudry, Léa Beaumelle, Andrea Čerevková, Enrique G de la Riva, El Aziz Djoudi, Tara Dirilgen, Róbert Gallé, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Landscape ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Roman BucherDepartment of Ecology, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, 03046 Cottbus, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3001-2876
Péter Batáry'Lendület' Landscape and Conservation Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Botany, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-1017-6996
Julia BaudryNutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center (CRESS), Sorbonne Paris Nord University and University Paris Cité, Inserm U1153, INRAE U1125, CNAM, 93017 Bobigny, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7919-6039
Léa BeaumelleFrench National Centre for Scientific Research CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7836-8767
Andrea ČerevkováInstitute of Parasitology SAS, Hlinková 3, 040 01 Kosice, Slovak Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9615-9870
Enrique G de la RivaArea of Ecology, Department of Biodiversity and Environmental Management, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of León, 24071 León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3393-8375
El Aziz DjoudiDepartment of Ecology, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, 03046 Cottbus, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-1219-7943
Tara DirilgenSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9687-9651
Róbert Gallé'Lendület' Landscape and Conservation Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Botany, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-5516-8623
Emmanuelle Kesse-GuyotNutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center (CRESS), Sorbonne Paris Nord University and University Paris Cité, Inserm U1153, INRAE U1125, CNAM, 93017 Bobigny, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9715-3534
Alison O'ReillySchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9736-0683
Ewa RembiałkowskaDepartment of Functional and Organic Food, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4109-5486
Adrien RuschINRAE, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, ISVV, Villenave d'Ornon, SAVE France.ORCID 0000-0002-3921-9750
Henrik G SmithDepartment of Biology & Centre for Environmental and Climate Science (CEC), Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2289-889X
Dara A StanleySchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8948-8409
Stuart P M RobertsAgroecology Lab, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Boulevard du Triomphe CP 264/02, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5473-4718
Werner UlrichDepartment of Ecology and Biogeography, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8715-6619
Klaus BirkhoferDepartment of Ecology, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, 03046 Cottbus, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9301-2443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Land-use intensification to increase yields is often detrimental to biodiversity undermining the provision of ecosystem services. However, it is questionable if ecosystem service providers contribute to ecological intensification by achieving the same or higher yields than conventional high-intensity agriculture. Objectives: In this study, we aimed to disentangle the effects of local and landscape-scale land-use intensification on arthropod communities and their contribution to ecosystem services and crop yield. A set of meta-analytic structural equation models allowed us to assess direct and indirect relationships in the cascade from land use to yield. Methods: We selected 37 datasets containing information on land use, community composition, levels of pollination and natural pest control services, and crop yield. We quantified functional diversity of communities by collecting trait information for three exemplary groups of service-providers: bees, ground beetles, and spiders. Results: Local land-use intensification reduced the abundance of all arthropod groups. Spiders were the only group whose species richness was negatively related to a higher percentage of arable land in the landscape. High abundance of bees related positively to oilseed rape pollination and crop yields. In the models for the two predator groups, crop yield was strongly determined by land use, independent of the pest control services provided by natural enemies. Conclusions: Our results suggest a potential for ecological intensification mediated by land-use change in crops where pollination benefits yield, but suggest more nuanced effects for pest control. Our study also calls for experiments on multiple taxonomic groups and ecosystem services that apply comparable methods at similar scales. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10980-025-02117-w.

Indexed as

AgroecologyEcological intensificationMeta-analytic structural equation modelsPest controlPollinationTrait-based approach

Identifiers

PMID40351550
PMCPMC12058943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.