Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351521›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2025

Learning from Reflection on Patient Outcomes Data: How EHR Can Support Trainees in Graduate Medical Education on Inpatient Rotations.

Margaret A Robinson, Christy Boscardin, Marieke Van der Schaaf, Justin L Sewell, Glenn Rosenbluth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Margaret A RobinsonDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2634-8331
Christy BoscardinDepartments of Medicine, and Department of Anesthesia, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9070-8859
Marieke Van der SchaafResearch and Development of Health Professions Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6555-5320
Justin L SewellDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4049-2874
Glenn RosenbluthDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco in San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0186-9755

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As healthcare evolves into interdisciplinary, complex, team-based care that often includes shiftwork and sub-specialization, patient outcomes data has become necessary for trainees to engage in reflective practice in clinical environments. However, current practices around collecting and distributing such data to trainees are not effective. Specifically, it is not clear what patient data are significant and compelling to trainees for reflective practice. The goal of our study was to characterize trainee perspectives on what data are meaningful to promote reflective activities for learning in the clinical work environment. Methods: From 2020-2021, we conducted a longitudinal cross-sectional study to assess trainee interest in clinical outcomes data. Over 14 days, pediatrics and internal medicine residents doing inpatient work at the University of California San Francisco completed surveys corresponding to recently opened patient charts. Results: 958 surveys were completed by 41 participants (average 23 unique patient encounters per participant). Trainees expressed interest in follow-up for 32.9% of encounters (n = 315/958), most often to 'learn if something significant or unexpected happened.' Trainees most often desired follow-up patient data when they had made significant decisions or felt responsible. Discussion: Trainees were interested in clinical outcomes data for a limited number of patient encounters, highlighting challenges with current strategies to promote reflective practice using clinical outcomes data. While refinement of such approaches continues through consideration of what trainees find meaningful in data, understanding motivating and demotivating factors in trainees' outcomes data-seeking behaviors will also be crucial for success in using such data for learning opportunities.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient Outcome AssessmentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansInternal MedicineInternship and ResidencyLearningLongitudinal StudiesMaleSan FranciscoSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40351521
PMCPMC12063598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.