ArticleJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases2025
Rifampicin-resistant
Article in Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global and regional trends in multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, 2000-2024 with forecasts to 2030: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra among smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis cases in southwestern Oromia, Ethiopia.IJID regions · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis, an infectious disease caused by Methods: Retrospective data archived in the Amhara Public Health Institute (APHI) TB laboratory from 2019 to 2024 were reviewed. Xpert MTB/RIF-Ultra software data were retrieved and transferred to Microsoft Excel. Then, it was checked for completeness, cleaned manually, and imported to Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25 software. The rate of Results: From June 30, 2019, to June 30, 2024, a total of 587,128 sputum samples were obtained from presumptive TB patients in 111 GeneXpert sites in the Amhara Region. Of these samples analyzed using Xpert MTB/RIF-Ultra, 6.17 % (36,212/587,128) were Mtb positive. Furthermore, the overall proportion of rifampicin resistance (RR) among Mtb-confirmed cases decreased to 3.03 % (1,096/36,212) and showed a downward trend from 4.62 % (184/3979) in 2020 to 2 % (176/8806) in 2024. The overall unsuccessful results (error, invalid & no result) were 6.48 %. The rate of unsuccessful results remained above the national target of < 5 % throughout the study periods. Conclusion and recommendation: The rate of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.