SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Direct oral anticoagulation versus no therapy or antiplatelet for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and history of intracranial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation and a history of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) face a dilemma when resuming anticoagulation therapy due to the risk of ICH recurrence versus the need for Ischemic stroke (IS) prevention. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) compared to no therapy or antiplatelets in these patients. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Electronic searches were performed in multiple databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus) up to March 1, 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) involving patients with atrial fibrillation and prior ICH. Studies compared the group with no therapy or antiplatelets (no-DOAC group). Outcomes assessed included mortality, IS, ICH recurrence, and major bleeding events. Results: Fifteen studies (8,318 patients) met the inclusion criteria, including 2,226 patients in the DOAC group and 5,936 in the no-OAC group. The major cardiovascular ischemic event was significantly lower in the DOAC group [OR = 0.11; CI 95% (0.03, 0.45); Conclusion: DOACs appear to reduce the risk of IS without increasing mortality or major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation and prior ICH. However, the risk of ICH recurrence remains uncertain. These findings suggest a potential role for DOACs in this high-risk population, but further RCTs are needed to confirm these results. Systematic review registration: Identifier CRD42024587511.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.