ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Frailty and cardiovascular safety of JAK inhibitors versus TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a real-world comparative study of drug effects and patient profiles.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative Safety of JAK Inhibitors vs TNF Antagonists in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Risk management plan adherence and clinical outcomes in patients receiving targeted therapies.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Observational
- Cardiovascular and Thromboembolic Risk of Janus Kinase Inhibitors Compared to Other Disease-Modifying Drugs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Frailty in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis: Current evidence and knowledge gaps.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026Review
- JAK inhibitors and adverse cardiovascular events: Class effect or molecule-specific risk?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Japanese evidence on Janus kinase inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: a narrative review of risk-optimized use.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Population-based validation of a frailty index using electronic regional healthcare records for public health use.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Switch from Intravenous to Subcutaneous Formulation of Tocilizumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Retrospective Cohort Analysis and Systematic Literature Review.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to comparatively assess the risk of cardiovascular events (CVEs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) and to explore the interactions with patient profiles [including age, baseline cardiovascular (CV) risk, and frailty, which is a state of decreased physiological reserve, assessed using a validated frailty index (FI) for healthcare administrative databases (AHDs)]. Methods: This retrospective study was based on AHDs of the Lombardy region, Italy (from 1st January 2020 to 31st December 2023). Cox regression models, both crude and adjusted, were applied to estimate the association between treatments and outcomes [CVEs, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and thromboembolic events (TEs)]. We tested the interaction between the drug treatment and the regulatory agency prescription rule changes [before or after 06th July 2021, the date of the first European Medicine Association (EMA) pronouncement on tofacitinib safety] or patient profiles. Results: We identified 7,541 therapeutic courses in 5,563 patients: 2,343 started as TNFi users, 1,443 as JAKi users, and 1,777 started with other drugs (1,459 days of follow-up). The crude incidence rates (IRs) for new CVEs were 16.6 [95% confidence intervals (95% CI): 12.8-21.2] and 18.6 (95% CI: 14.2-23.9) per 1,000 person-years (PYs) for TNFi and JAKi users, respectively. Exposure to JAKis was not associated with a significantly increased risk of CVEs [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.92; 95% CI: 0.64-1.32], MACEs (adjusted HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.37-1.33), or TEs (adjusted HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 0.65-3.65) compared to TNFis. Each 0.1-point increment of the FI significantly increased the HR for new CVEs (HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.48-2.19), MACEs (HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.10-2.51), and TEs (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.03-2.78). When assessing the interaction between the period of drug delivery and the treatment with JAKis on the risk of new CVEs, no significant interaction was observed (p = 0.838), while the interaction was statistically significant for baseline CV risk (p = 0.007). Conclusion: RA patients treated with JAKis in real-world settings have a risk of developing CVEs no higher than those of TNFi users, but potential signals remain for TEs, even if the sample was not sufficiently powered. Patient profiles, particularly the frailty, have a more substantial impact on the risk of CVEs than the specific disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.