Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351416›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Effectiveness and safety of single anti-seizure medication as adjunctive therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy based on network meta-analysis.

Nian-Jia Deng, Xin-Yi Li, Zhi-Xin Zhang, Chen-Yang Xian-Yu, Yu-Ting Tao, Yu-Tong Ma, Hui-Jun Li, Teng-Yu Gao, Xin Liu, Jie Luo and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Cenobamate: An Appraisal Five Years On.Neurology and therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nian-Jia DengCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center of Central Nervous System Repair and Functional Reconstruction, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Xin-Yi LiCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center of Central Nervous System Repair and Functional Reconstruction, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Zhi-Xin ZhangCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center of Central Nervous System Repair and Functional Reconstruction, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Chen-Yang Xian-YuCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center of Central Nervous System Repair and Functional Reconstruction, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Yu-Ting TaoCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center of Central Nervous System Repair and Functional Reconstruction, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Yu-Tong MaCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center of Central Nervous System Repair and Functional Reconstruction, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Hui-Jun LiCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center of Central Nervous System Repair and Functional Reconstruction, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Teng-Yu GaoCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center of Central Nervous System Repair and Functional Reconstruction, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Xin LiuCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center of Central Nervous System Repair and Functional Reconstruction, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Jie LuoCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center of Central Nervous System Repair and Functional Reconstruction, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Chao ZhangCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center of Central Nervous System Repair and Functional Reconstruction, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Sheng-Li HuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center of Central Nervous System Repair and Functional Reconstruction, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluated the effectiveness and safety of single anti-seizure medication (ASM) when used as adjunctive therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMbase, and the Cochrane Library from their inception until 12 February, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting our criteria. The trials were analyzed for their use of ASMs in treating drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Inclusion criteria comprised: 1) Participants aged 12 years or older with drug-resistant focal epilepsy; 2) Incorporation of an additional single ASM as an adjunct to the existing antiepileptic treatment regimen; 3) Comparison with placebo or continuation of the original antiepileptic regimen without a new ASM; 4) Primary outcome as a 50% response rate, with safety as a secondary outcome, encompassing dizziness, somnolence, headache, ataxia, diplopia, fatigue, and nausea; and 5) Study design limited to RCTs. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was employed to rank the effectiveness and safety of the ASMs. Results: A total of 53 RCTs involving 17 ASMs as adjunctive therapy and placebo were analyzed. Compared to placebo, the following ASMs demonstrated statistically significant effectiveness in achieving a 50% response rate: brivaracetam (RR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.53-2.81), cenobamate (RR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.56-2.88), eslicarbazepine acetate (RR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.41-2.70), gabapentin (RR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.76-3.02), lacosamide (RR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.47-3.35), lamotrigine (RR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.00-2.40), levetiracetam (RR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.88-3.15), oxcarbazepine (RR = 3.03, 95% CI: 2.08-4.40), perampanel (RR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.21-2.44), pregabalin (RR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.70-2.50), rufinamide (RR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.20-4.31), tiagabine (RR = 4.07, 95% CI: 2.03-8.18), topiramate (RR = 3.10, 95% CI: 2.44-3.95), vigabatrin (RR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.58-3.46), and zonisamide (RR = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.76-3.27). Based on SUCRA rankings, tiagabine (92.7%) exhibited the most favorable therapeutic outcome, followed by topiramate (87.3%), oxcarbazepine (83%), and levetiracetam (62.8%). The ASMs with the least favorable therapeutic effects were placebo (1.1%), lamotrigine (17.8%), and perampanel (24.7%). Conclusion: The network meta-analysis revealed topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, and levetiracetam as the four most effective adjuvant ASM treatments for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. However, it is noteworthy that topiramate and oxcarbazepine were associated with a higher incidence of somnolence. Additionally, comprehensive safety data for tiagabine and levetiracetam are lacking, necessitating further research. Larger studies are required to solidify these findings and better understand the safety profiles of all involved ASMs.

Indexed as

anti-seizure medicationdrug-resistant focal seizuresgabapentinlevetiracetampregabalintopiramate

Identifiers

PMID40351416
PMCPMC12061871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.