ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025
New chapter in precision medicine: strategies for endoscopic resection of 10-20 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.
Review in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The preferred resection methods for 10-20 mm non-pedunculated lesions remain unclear. This review summarizes the current methods and novel technologies for resecting 10-20 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps, mainly focusing on hot snare polypectomy, cold snare polypectomy (CSP), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The application of novel techniques involving bipolar snares and low-power pure-cut is expected to reduce adverse events (AEs) related to thermal damage, but prospective studies are needed to confirm their reliability. CSP, including conventional CSP and submucosal injection CSP (SI-CSP), maintains resection efficacy with dedicated snares or submucosal injection for regular non-pedunculated polyps and serrated lesions with a low AE rate of 0.0%-3.4%. Modified EMR techniques such as underwater EMR, tip-in EMR, and EMR-circumferential precutting demonstrate a 15.0%-20.0% increase in en bloc resection rates compared with conventional EMR while also reducing AEs. ESD is recommended as the preferred method for medium-sized colorectal lesions with suspected submucosal invasion, fibrosis, particularly when the procedure is technically challenging. In addition, optical diagnosis is essential for pathological assessment and precise resection. Also, postoperative follow-up is needed for high-risk lesions and cases with unsatisfactory resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.