ArticleAEM education and training2025
Procedural skill retention in transvenous pacer placement among emergency medicine physician trainees.
Article in AEM education and training, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Faculty Development for High-Acuity Procedures: A Train-the-Trainer Simulation-Based Innovation for Transvenous Pacemaker Placement.AEM education and training · 2026Article
- Article
- Procedural skill retention in transvenous pacer placement among emergency medicine physician trainees.AEM education and training · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transvenous cardiac pacing (TVP) is a life-saving intervention that is infrequently performed in emergency medicine (EM). While competency can be achieved through dedicated procedural training, the longevity of skill retention in TVP placement has not been well demonstrated. Our study sought to assess retention of procedural skills among EM resident physicians following an immersive TVP training simulation. Methods: EM residents at a single academic tertiary care center participated in an immersive TVP training session using a high-fidelity simulator. The paradigm of deliberate practice was used to establish competency in the procedure, which was defined by success on a previously published checklist. Immediately following the training, each resident was tested on the checklist and a Global Rating Scale (GRS; 0-100). Three faculty raters assessed resident performance on these instruments. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Competency in TVP placement skill retention was then reassessed at 3 months. The paired-samples Results: Thirty-one EM resident physicians participated in the study, with 25 completing the 3-month follow-up assessment. Immediately following the workshop, the mean (±SD) score on the 0-30 checklist was 29.7 (±0.51), while the mean score on the GRS was 98.3 (±1.9). At 3-month follow-up, the mean (±SD) score on the checklist decreased to 21.6 (±5; Conclusions: Decay of skills in transvenous pacemaker placement was apparent at 3 months following initial baseline competency demonstration after an immersive training session. These findings may help inform TVP procedural teaching frequency for EM resident trainees.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.