ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025
Identification of Key Mitochondrial Autophagy-Related Genes in Fetal Growth Restriction.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify key mitochondrial autophagy-related genes (MARGs) in fetal growth restriction (FGR)and evaluate their diagnostic potential through bioinformatics and machine learning approaches. Methods: The GSE24192 dataset were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus data base (GEO). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using differentially expressed analysis. Mitochondrial autophagy-related genes (MARGs) were identified using GeneCards. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were performed with the clusterProfiler package. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using STRING, and key genes were selected using machine learning. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves assessed diagnostic performance of key genes. Immune infiltration analysis was used to evaluated immune microenvironment. The miRNAs were predicted in TargetScan website. Results: A total of 42 MARGs were identified in FGR samples, and three key genes (THBS1, RAB15, LMO7) were selected through machine learning methods. These genes showed high diagnostic potential with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.97, 0.95, and 0.92, respectively. Immune infiltration analysis revealed significant increase of CD8+ T cells, endothelial cells, and macrophages in FGR samples. Correlation analysis indicated THBS1 was positively related to several immune cells, while RAB15 and LMO7 were negatively related to several immune cells. The miRNA-mRNA regulatory network revealed four miRNAs potentially regulating these key genes. Conclusion: In conclusion, our study identified THBS1, RAB15, and LMO7 as key mitochondrial autophagy-related genes in FGR, with potential as diagnostic biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.