Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351244›Full record

ReviewGlobal change biology2025

Biodiversity and Management as Central Players in the Network of Relationships Underlying Forest Resilience.

Pilar Hurtado, Josep Maria Espelta, Luciana Jaime, Jordi Martínez-Vilalta, Manto Samou Kokolaki, Marcus Lindner, Francisco Lloret

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pilar HurtadoCREAF, E08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7859-8960
Josep Maria EspeltaCREAF, E08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0242-4988
Luciana JaimeCREAF, E08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2452-6790
Jordi Martínez-VilaltaCREAF, E08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2332-7298
Manto Samou KokolakiDepartment of Natural Resources Development and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0770-003X
Marcus LindnerEuropean Forest Institute, Bonn, Germany.
Francisco LloretCREAF, E08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9836-4069

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global change is threatening the integrity of forest ecosystems worldwide, amplifying the need for resilience-based management to ensure their conservation and sustain the services they provide. Yet, current efforts are still limited by the lack of implementation of clear frameworks for operationalizing resilience in decision-making processes. To overcome this limitation, we aim to identify reliable and effective drivers of forest resilience, considering their synergies and trade-offs. From a comprehensive review of 342 scientific articles addressing resilience in forests globally, we identified factors shaping forest resilience. We recognized them into two categories that influence forest responses to disturbances: resilience predictors, which can be modified through management, and codrivers, which are measurable but largely unmanageable (e.g., climate). We then performed network analyses based on predictors and codrivers underlying forest resilience. In total, we recognized 5332 such relationships linking predictors or codrivers with forest attributes resilience. Our findings support the central role of biodiversity, with mixed, non-planted, or functionally diverse forests promoting resilience across all contexts and biomes. While management also enhanced resilience, the success of specific interventions was highly context-dependent, suggesting that its application requires a careful analysis of trade-offs. Specifically, practices like cutting and prescribed burning generally enhanced resilience in terms of tree growth, plant diversity, landscape vegetation cover, and stand structure. In contrast, pest and herbivore control reduced the resilience of plant taxonomic diversity while offering only minimal gains for other variables. Even long-term restoration projects showed clear trade-offs in the resilience of different forest attributes, highlighting the need for careful consideration of these effects in practical management decisions. Overall, we emphasize that a reduced number of predictors can be used to effectively promote forest resilience across most attributes. Particularly, enhancing biodiversity and implementing targeted management strategies when biodiversity is impoverished emerge as powerful tools to promote forest resilience.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesForestryForestsClimate Changebiodiversityconservationforest ecosystemsforest managementnetwork analysisoperationalresilience

Identifiers

PMID40351244
PMCPMC12067180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.