ArticleJournal of athletic training2025
Salary Negotiation Dynamics for Athletic trainers: Insights from Employers on Expectations and Organizational Influences.
Article in Journal of athletic training, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextWhile researchers have previously identified that most athletic trainers (ATs) do not negotiate their salary, little is known about employers' expectations and behaviors relative to establishing and negotiating salaries for the ATs they hire.
objectiveTo examine employers' expectations and behaviors regarding AT salary negotiation.
designCross-sectional.
settingWeb-based survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER
participants413 employers who are in a role that requires them to negotiate salary offers with prospective AT employees and who have minimally hired one AT into the organization they work for accessed the survey from a random sample of 7,000 ATs (6% access rate); 324 employers (age=43.8±10.6 years) completed the entire survey (78% completion rate). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): A validated survey was used to collect employer demographics, employment organization characteristics, and employer perspectives on negotiation. Chi-square analyses with Bonferonni adjustments were used to determine relationships between organizational factors or employer demographics on employers' negotiation expectations and behaviors.
results67.3% of employers expect the candidate to negotiate their salary, and 66.3% reported they are provided the salary range by someone else from their organization. More employers of rurally-located organizations offer in the upper 1/3 of the available range when compared to suburban or urban settings (p=.014). Employers of public organizations also offer more in the upper 1/3 of the available salary range compared to private organizations (p=.025). More employers who were not healthcare providers have withdrawn an employment offer due to negotiation attempts (p=.005).
conclusionsThe lack of organizational influence on negotiation expectations indicates that negotiation attempts do not need to be tailored to specific work settings. ATs may need to adjust expectations when negotiating with publicly-funded or rurally-located organizations, as the offer may already be towards the upper end of the available range. Employers expect ATs to negotiate their salary when offered a position.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.