ReviewCirculation. Heart failure2025
Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure: Twenty Years in Review, Lessons Learned, and the Road Ahead.
Review in Circulation. Heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Initiation, Adherence, and Persistence to Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy After Heart Failure Hospitalization.JAMA internal medicine · 2026Article
- Tailored Text Messaging Intervention to Improve Self-Care in Patients With Heart Failure (Text4HF): Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Vericiguat in the Post-Stabilization Phase of HFrEF: Targeting Residual Risk Across the Ischemia-Decompensation Continuum.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Exploration of the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Heart Failure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Improving Heart Failure Quality of Care Over the First Twenty Years: The Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Program.Circulation. Heart failure · 2026Article
- Article
- High-volume centers achieve superior outcomes in left ventricular assist device explant-heart transplantation.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Diabetic kidney disease within the framework of cardio-kidney-metabolic health: a paradigm shift.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Optimizing an LLM-Based Clinical Data Querying System Using Metadata Enrichment and Task Decomposition.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- An instrument for measuring the influence of nursing care on the length of stay in heart failure hospitalizations of African Americans.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure program was developed in 2005 with the goal of bringing evidence-based guidelines in heart failure management into widespread clinical practice. The program includes workshops, webinars, tool kits, chart abstraction, performance benchmarking, and achievement awards to drive quality improvement at participating hospitals. Two decades after its inception, the program has grown to include over 600 participating institutions across the United States. Linking registry data to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims has also allowed for the evaluation of longitudinal outcomes. Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure has helped improve the quality of care for patients and has contributed substantially to the understanding of clinical science and optimal management of heart failure. This narrative review provides an overview of the indelible impact of the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure program on quality heart failure care over the past 20 years and highlights future challenges and directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.