ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2025
Impact of social determinants of health on treatment patterns and outcomes in multiple myeloma.
Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Food and Nutrition Insecurity in Cancer Survivorship: A Global Scoping Review.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsEvaluate treatment and outcomes by social determinants of health (SDoH) in multiple myeloma (MM), which are important for improving care and outcomes.
methodsThis was a retrospective study of real-world patients enrolled in a US insurance claims database (MM diagnosis, July 2018-December 2022) with linkage to a SDoH database, supplemented with mortality, provider affiliation (academic/community), and socioeconomically disadvantaged area databases. Treatment and outcomes were evaluated across SDoH domains: race/ethnicity, education level, transportation access, food insecurity, risky health behaviors, living in disadvantaged areas, healthcare needs, and ease of healthcare-systems engagement.
resultsThe study included 4768 patients (2295 and 2731 with care-setting and treatment data); median follow-up, 584 days. Patients treated in academic versus community settings were less likely to be food insecure and live in disadvantaged areas and had lower healthcare needs. Stem cell transplant was more common in White versus non-White patients, those with low versus high food insecurity and healthcare needs, and high versus low ease of healthcare-systems engagement. In multivariable analysis, high versus low disadvantaged areas (HR = 1.75) and medium versus low food insecurity (HR = 1.80) were associated with shorter overall survival.
conclusionsThese findings indicate a need for improved access to care in the broader MM population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.