Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351100›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025

How consistent is 'the dynamic gut'? Complex physiological responses to dietary fiber and protein across three rodent species.

Kevin D Kohl, Nick Barts, Karen Peralta Martínez, Anna Lackey, Emily Lyons, Matthew J Maier, Maya Maurer, Domenique Tripoli, Tate Yawitz, Rodolfo Martínez-Mota and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kevin D KohlDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1126-2949
Nick BartsDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Karen Peralta MartínezDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-2009-0937
Anna LackeyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Emily LyonsDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Matthew J MaierDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Maya MaurerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6483-2872
Domenique TripoliDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Tate YawitzDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Rodolfo Martínez-MotaCentro de Investigaciones Tropicales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz 91000, Mexico.
Bret PaschSchool of Natural Resources and the Environment, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9168-6770
M Denise DearingSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Brian K TrevellineDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation IOS 1942587University of Pittsburgh
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To efficiently digest food resources that may vary spatially and temporally, animals maintain physiological flexibility across levels of organization. For example, in response to dietary shifts, animals may exhibit changes in the expression of digestive enzymes, the size of digestive organs or the structure of their gut microbiome. A 'Grand Challenge' in comparative physiology is to understand how components of flexibility across organizational levels may scale to cumulatively determine organismal performance. Here, we conducted feeding trials on three rodent species with disparate feeding strategies: herbivorous montane voles (Microtus montanus), omnivorous white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) and carnivorous grasshopper mice (Onychomys torridus). For each species, four groups of individuals were presented with diets that varied in carbohydrate, fiber and protein content. After 4-5 weeks, we measured organismal performance in the form of nutrient digestibility (dry matter, nitrogen, fiber). We also measured gut anatomy and organ size, and conducted enzyme assays on various tissues to measure activities of carbohydrases and peptidases. We found some shared physiological responses, e.g. fiber generally increased gut size across species. However, the specifics of these responses were distinct across species, suggesting different capacities for flexibility. Thus, in the context of digestion, we still lack an understanding of how flexibility across organizational levels may scale to determine whole-animal performance.

Indexed as

ArvicolinaeDietary FiberDietary ProteinsGastrointestinal TractPeromyscusAnimalsDietDigestionFemaleMaleDietary FiberDietary ProteinsDigestive enzymesIntegrative physiologyNutritional ecologyPhenotypic flexibility

Identifiers

PMID40351100
PMCPMC12212646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.