Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351023›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Evaluating a Targeted Language Intervention for Children Aged 4-6 Years-Applying an 'Information Carrying Words' Approach.

Sarah Spencer, Laura Pearce, Karlene Calder, Alice Woods, Abigail Andrews, Judy Clegg

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah SpencerSchool of Allied Health Professions, Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2872-5575
Laura PearceSheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Karlene CalderNottinghamshire County Council, Nottingham, UK.
Alice WoodsSheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Abigail AndrewsSchool of Allied Health Professions, Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Judy CleggSchool of Allied Health Professions, Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVery little research has investigated the use of the information carrying words (ICW) construct within language interventions, despite its very widespread use in speech and language therapy in the United Kingdom. The Language Enrichment Activity Programme (LEAP) is an intervention programme that applies the ICW construct to differentiate children's level of need and structure play-based learning activities. LEAP sessions are designed to be child-led, building language skills through application of communication supporting strategies (CSS) such as modelling, recasting and inviting communicative participation via choices and expectant pausing.

aimsThis study aims to evaluate the impact of trainee speech and language therapists (SLTs) delivering LEAP on the language skills of primary school children (aged 4-6 years). METHODS AND PROCEDURES: One hundred eighteen children were selected by their teachers. Participating children were semi-randomly allocated to either a control group (n = 48) or to a group that received 12 sessions of LEAP over 6 weeks (n = 70). A smaller sub-cohort was followed up 8 weeks following the end of LEAP (received LEAP n = 41, control group n = 46). LEAP was delivered by trainee SLTs to small groups of children. Assessments were carried out blind to group allocation pre- and post-intervention in order to evaluate the impact of intervention on receptive and expressive language skills. Outcome measures were a bespoke comprehension and expression outcome measure and the Renfrew Action Picture Test (RAPT; Renfrew 2019).

resultsChildren who received LEAP had improved scores on both the RAPT assessment and the bespoke outcome measure. There was a significant interaction between time (pre- and post-intervention) and group (those who received LEAP vs. the control) for the RAPT grammar score, and the LEAP vocabulary and expressive ICW score. LEAP had less of an impact for a sub-cohort followed up 8 weeks following the intervention, with only the LEAP expressive score showing significant interaction between the three assessment time points and group (those who received LEAP vs. the control). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The LEAP was successfully delivered to small groups of children and supported them in developing their expressive language skills. Working with trainee SLTs increased the capacity to deliver LEAP at a low cost to schools. Results are promising and add to an emerging evidence base for the application of the ICW construct within SLT intervention programmes. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Use of an information carrying words (ICW) construct in speech and language therapy is very common in the United Kingdom, and yet very little research has been done in this area. There is strong evidence for the role of communication supporting strategies (e.g., recasting, giving choices, and use of multisensory input) to accelerate children's language development. However, more translational research is needed to investigate the impact of interventions which include such strategies. New service delivery models are also needed to facilitate increased access to interventions, particularly beyond the preschool years and where schools are unable to staff comprehensive language interventions internally. What this study adds This project evaluates the impact of a targeted language intervention programme for children in the early stages of primary school in the United Kingdom: the Language Enrichment Activities Programme (LEAP). This programme uses ICW to differentiate language intervention activities, while using robust communication supporting strategies during sessions. The study evaluates the impact of LEAP on a cohort of 118 children from 8 schools, with promising results. Children who received LEAP had increased scores on measures of expressive language when compared to children who did not take part in LEAP. What are the clinical implications of this study? Our study adds to an emerging evidence base supporting the application of the ICW construct within language interventions. It also offers a model for collaboration between schools, speech and language therapy services, and trainee speech and language therapists to increase capacity for targeted small group interventions for language skills in early primary school. The paper uses the LEAP intervention as a starting point for discussion about how to best deliver targeted small group interventions and issues in making these types of groups inclusive and accessible.

Indexed as

Child LanguageLanguage Development DisordersLanguage TherapySpeech TherapyChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLanguage TestsMaleUnited KingdominterventionLanguageschool‐age children

Identifiers

PMID40351023
PMCPMC12067031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.