ArticleJournal of anatomy2025
Multiple developmental origins of the avian propatagial muscle and their evolutionary implications.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anatomical Atlas and Three-Dimensional Musculoskeletal Model of the Flight Apparatus in the Southern Screamer (Anseriformes:Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Multiple developmental origins of the avian propatagial muscle and their evolutionary implications.Journal of anatomy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ever since the origin of tetrapod limbs, the composition and arrangement of skeletal muscles in tetrapod limbs have been largely conserved throughout evolution. There are, however, several exceptions in which new musculoskeletal connections have been evolutionarily established. The propatagial muscle of birds represents such an example, and there is no comparable muscle in the other tetrapod lineages. Here, we investigate the detailed developmental process of forelimb muscles in the embryos of the chicken and the outgroup taxa. Based on histological and 3D morphological observations in the chicken, the propatagial muscle developed from multiple cell masses derived from parts of the developing musculus (m.) deltoideus scapularis, m. pectoralis, m. biceps brachii, and m. extensor carpi radialis, in association with the hypertrophied dermis along the cranial edge of the developing propatagium. We also performed in situ hybridization of Scx and found that there were no tendon progenitor cells along the cranial edge of the propatagium during this process. It is likely that the avian propatagial muscle evolved through recruitment of muscle progenitor cells derived from parts of the m. deltoideus scapularis, m. pectoralis, m. biceps brachii, and m. extensor carpi radialis, devoid of new interactions with tendon progenitor cells. This study will contribute to a better understanding of how novel musculoskeletal connections can arise from the highly evolutionarily conserved composition and arrangement of skeletal muscles in tetrapod limbs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.