ArticleJournal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence2025
Measuring outness in a national sample of sexual minority, gender minority, and sexual and gender minority youth.
Article in Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although are several reliable measures used to assess outness levels, they were developed and validated for lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Using a national dataset of sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY) ages 13-17 (M = 15.57, SD = 1.27), this study examined the psychometric properties of a new outness measure to assess its structure and validity. This data source is unique in that it allowed for strategic comparisons among three subpopulations: cisgender sexual minority youth (CSMY), youth with both sexual and gender minority identifications (SMGMY), and heterosexual gender minority youth (HGMY). Accordingly, this study examined the measurement invariance of a sexual minority (SM) outness measure to assess if the same latent constructs are measured when it is completed by CSMY and SMGMY (i.e., sexual identity outness), as well as a gender minority (GM) outness measure when completed by HGMY and SMGMY (i.e., gender identity outness). Factor analysis results reveal that the measure accurately assesses gender and sexual identity outness. Measurement invariance results confirm that comparisons can be made between CSMY and SMGMY as well as between HGMY and SMGMY. This analysis highlights an opportunity to improve how outness is assessed and how it may function differently between SM and GM communities and for youth compared to adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.