Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40350775›Full record

ArticleCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2025

Complications Leading to Death in Patients Supported by the Impella 5.5: Analysis From the FDA MAUDE Database.

Omar Khalil, Hussein Krayem, Aditya Kesari, Arun U Mahtani, Matthew G Kaye, Charlotte Roberts, Inna Tchoukina, Melissa C Smallfield, Josue Chery, Zubair A Hashmi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Omar KhalilDepartment of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-9726-3785
Hussein KrayemDepartment of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-6460-4708
Aditya KesariDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Arun U MahtaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Matthew G KayeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Charlotte RobertsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Inna TchoukinaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Melissa C SmallfieldDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Josue CheryDepartment of Surgery, Pauley Heart Center, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Zubair A HashmiDepartment of Surgery, Pauley Heart Center, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Michael C KontosDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Keyur B ShahDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Pengyang LiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Impella 5.5 is increasingly being used in patients with cardiogenic shock, but experience with the device remains limited, and severe complications, including death, have been reported. This study aims to investigate causes of Impella 5.5-related deaths.

methodsData were extracted from the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database using the search term "Impella 5.5" with the outcome "death." Case details were reviewed and summarized.

resultsA total of 47 cases were reviewed. Of these, four cases were excluded as unrelated to the device. Among the 43 cases included, 40 involved either procedural-related or device-related complications. The remaining three cases had an indeterminant cause. Procedural complications were observed in 26 cases (61%). Of these, 16 cases (37%) involved cardiac perforation, which was frequently caused by improper placement or re-positioning of the device. Five cases (12%) involved graft/vessel-related complications, including bleeding, detachment from the aorta, or dissection, which were linked to technical difficulties during insertion or suturing. The remaining five cases (12%) involved valve damage or device malposition. Device-related complications were reported in 14 cases (33%). Of these, eight cases (19%) were device malfunctions including pump stoppage due to issues such as electrical failure, biomaterial ingestion, or lumen damage. Six patients (14%) experienced device-related clot formation and/or stroke.

conclusionsCardiac perforation emerged as the most frequent complication associated with Impella 5.5-related deaths, followed by device malfunction. These findings highlight the need for improved operational techniques, better device reliability, and refined safety protocols for Impella 5.5 usage.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesProsthesis ImplantationShock, CardiogenicUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentcomplicationsdeathheart failureImpella 5.5mechanical circulatory support

Identifiers

PMID40350775
PMCPMC12231167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.