ArticleJournal of periodontal & implant science2025
Clinical evaluation of tapered-straight-tapered dental implants: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Journal of periodontal & implant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction and risk factor analysis of dental implant failure using Cox regression and machine learning.Journal of periodontology · 2026Article
- Zirconia and Titanium Implants Placed at Two Supracrestal Levels in Fresh Extraction Socket: Canine Periodontitis Model.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival rate and marginal bone loss (MBL) of tapered-straight-tapered dental implants, considering various associated factors, over an observational period of ≥5 years.
methodsThis study included 186 patients who underwent tapered-straight-tapered dental implant placement at Seoul National University Dental Hospital from 2014 to 2019. Digital panoramic radiographic images and dental records were examined. We evaluated multiple variables, such as sex, age, diabetes mellitus (DM), smoking status, placement region, jaw type (maxilla and mandible), implant diameter, implant length, staged surgery, immediate placement, splinted prosthesis, and implant placement depth (IPD). We first determined the implant survival rate using Kaplan-Meier analysis and analyzed potential risk factors for implant survival using mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards regression. Next, the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to examine differences in MBL across variables. Linear mixed-effects models with backward stepwise selection were used to identify associations between risk factors and MBL.
resultsThis study included 316 implants in 186 patients, monitored over a follow-up period of 7.0±1.36 years. The cumulative survival rate of the implants was 98.1%. The average mesial and distal MBLs were 0.59±1.36 mm and 0.68±1.36 mm, respectively. Linear mixed-effects models indicated that MBL exhibited statistically significant positive correlations with DM (Coeff.=0.614,
conclusionsThis study demonstrated a high cumulative survival rate for tapered-straight-tapered dental implants over a 5-year period. DM, staged surgery, and IPD showed strong associations with increased MBL. The results suggest that tapered-straight-tapered implants offer advantages in terms of peri-implant MBL and consistent clinical outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of considering these variables in clinical decision-making to optimize implant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.