ArticleJournal of periodontal & implant science2025
From tradition to innovation: a bibliometric analysis of the evolution of periodontal plastic surgery.
Article in Journal of periodontal & implant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the periodontal plastic surgery literature to identify trends, research gaps, and key themes within the field and to establish a perspective on documented research.
methodsThis bibliometric study examined research outputs on mucogingival surgery indexed in the Web of Science database from 1990 to 2023. The Science Mapping Analysis Tool (SciMAT) software was used to visualize and predict research trends on this topic.
resultsAn analysis of publication distribution by year revealed a decline in the number of publications between 1984 and 1995, followed by an overall upward trend after 1996 despite occasional decreases. The United States contributed the most with 593 publications, and Wang HL (n=74) was the most prolific author. The most frequently used keyword was "gingival recession" (n=625). Overall, the publications received 44,859 citations, averaging 25.49 citations per publication.
conclusionsResearchers have made significant efforts to improve clinical practices and procedures in periodontal plastic surgery, resulting in an increase in studies over recent years. By analyzing thematic maps and clusters-using indicators such as frequency, citations, and centrality-researchers can identify the strengths, weaknesses, and gaps in current research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.