Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40350575›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Electrochemotherapy for Recurrence and/or Metastatic Skin Cancers: A Prospective Case Series in Iran.

Seyed Mojtaba YazdanParast, Sepideh Mansouri, Farshid Rostami Pouria, Navid Manoochehri, Kosar Namakin, Alvand Naserghandi, Seyed Rouhollah Miri, Habibollah Mahmoodzadeh, Omid Nabavian, Shirin Zaresharifi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Seyed Mojtaba YazdanParastNano Electronic Center of Excellence, Nano Bio Electronic Devices Lab, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0009-0008-8193-0766
Sepideh MansouriUT and TUMS Cancer Electronics Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farshid Rostami PouriaNano Electronic Center of Excellence, Nano Bio Electronic Devices Lab, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Navid ManoochehriNano Electronic Center of Excellence, Nano Bio Electronic Devices Lab, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Kosar NamakinStudent Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alvand NaserghandiStudent Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Rouhollah MiriDepartment of General Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Cancer Institute, Tehran, Iran.
Habibollah MahmoodzadehDepartment of General Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Cancer Institute, Tehran, Iran.
Omid NabavianDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4406-7568
Shirin ZaresharifiSkin Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad AbdolahadNano Electronic Center of Excellence, Nano Bio Electronic Devices Lab, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1091-3095

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the efficacy of electrochemotherapy on the three common types of skin cancer, including basal cell carcinoma (BCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), and melanoma.Methods26 patients with skin cancer were recruited from single cancer treatment centers from 2022 to 2024. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) was performed to treat the cancerous nodules; all nodules in a patient with multiple lesions were treated. However the biggest lesions were always pointed out (according to European Standard Operating Procedures on Electrochemotherapy protocol) and their clinical response and adverse effects were evaluated during the study.Resultstotally, 104 nodules of 26 patients were assessed. Clinical complete response was achieved in 53 lesions, while partial response was observed in 51 lesions after first month of treatment. The most common adverse effect was pain which was in 65% of cases.ConclusionBCC shows a notably higher clinical complete response rate. Because the research was conducted at a single center and given the novelty of this treatment in Iran, the number of patients included in the study was limited. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) has shown significant clinical effectiveness for superficial tumors, especially for patients who have health issues related to standard therapies or who are resistant to conventional treatments. It is generally well-tolerated, with side effects predominantly consisting of temporary pain. Ongoing research aims to expand its use in deep-seated tumors that are resistant to conventional therapies.

Indexed as

Basal Cell CarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellElectrochemotherapyMelanomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProspective Studiesadverse effectselectrochemotherapyelectroporationresponse rateskin cancer

Identifiers

PMID40350575
PMCPMC12066867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.