ArticleScientific reports2025
Dynamic bone recognition for robotic vertebral plate cutting via unit energy consumption and SVM optimized by PSO.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advancements in Machine Learning-Assisted Flexible Electronics: Technologies, Applications, and Future Prospects.Biosensors · 2026Pooled it
- AI-driven tissue discrimination sensing methods for robot-assisted spine surgery: a state-of-the-art review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current orthopedic robots lack the ability to dynamically sense or accurately recognize bone layers during vertebral plate decompression surgery, limiting their ability to adjust actions in real time as skilled surgeons do. This study aims to improve robotic vertebral plate cutting by developing a bone recognition model that utilizes a unit energy consumption feature vector and support vector machines (SVM) optimized with particle swarm optimization (PSO). An experimental setup using fresh pig bones of varying densities was established, and cutting experiments were performed under different parameters. Force signals from various cutting directions were analyzed, and wavelet threshold noise reduction was applied to transverse cutting forces. A feature space distribution was mapped, and total energy consumption was calculated to create the unit energy consumption function. Feature vectors were spatially mapped, and the effectiveness of energy consumption-based feature extraction was assessed. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used for further feature extraction and dimensionality reduction. The data was normalized, and an SVM-based bone identification model was developed, optimized by PSO. The optimized model achieved bone identification accuracy of 90.64%, compared to 83.56% using traditional feature extraction techniques. Cross-validation through experiments demonstrated a 7.08% improvement in classification accuracy. The study confirms the feasibility of the predictive bone recognition model, which enhances the precision of robotic vertebral plate cutting by enabling real-time dynamic adjustment of cutting parameters based on bone type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.