Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40350500›Full record

SynthesisUpdates in surgery2026

Detection of anatomic landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the use of artificial intelligence-a systematic review of the literature.

Dimitrios Kehagias, Charalampos Lampropoulos, Aggeliki Bellou, Ioannis Kehagias

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dimitrios KehagiasDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, Hull, HU16 5 JQ, UK. dimikech@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7691-6355
Charalampos LampropoulosIntensive Care Unit, Saint Andrew's General Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Aggeliki BellouIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Ioannis KehagiasDepartment of Surgery, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the critical view of safety (CVS) and other safe anatomic landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the cornerstone for avoiding bile duct injuries (BDI). Artificial intelligence (AI), which has infiltrated in the operating room, appears as a promising tool, enabling surgeons to safely dissect during LC. The aim of this study is to investigate the AI models and their performance for identifying these critical structures. A systematic literature review of the PubMed and Google Scholar databases was conducted using medical subject headings (MeSH). Studies presenting the application of AI models for identifying CVS and anatomic landmarks were included and analyzed in terms of performance and reliability. Clinical feasibility trials with preliminary data were separately analyzed. Seventeen studies were found eligible and analyzed for various parameters. Generating AI models for identifying CVS and anatomic landmarks during LC is feasible, while their performance in terms of accuracy, precision and recall has remarkably improved. Regarding their reliability, intersection over union (IoU) and F1/Dice scores have been improved, as well. AI models can be successfully deployed in the operating room, and could assist surgeons in decision-making. Implementation of AI during LC for identifying CVS and important anatomic landmarks appears as a feasible and promising option. Preliminary data are encouraging in terms of performance but still major obstacles and barriers need to be overcome. Whether this will lead to reduced BDIs and enhanced patient safety, requires more well-designed studies. PROSPERO database registration: (UIN: CRD42024557432).

Indexed as

Anatomic LandmarksArtificial IntelligenceBile DuctsCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicHumansReproducibility of ResultsArtificial intelligenceBile duct injuryCritical view of safetyLaparoscopic cholecystectomySafety

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.