SynthesisUpdates in surgery2026
Detection of anatomic landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the use of artificial intelligence-a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Automated Recognition of Hepatocystic Anatomy During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Current Evidence, Clinical Readiness, and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Assessment of Safety and Errors in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Treatment of Gallstone Disease in Southeastern Mexico.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Preoperative and perioperative predictors of prolonged hospital stay after uncomplicated elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Global trends in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS): a bibliometric analysis (2000-2024).Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- AI-based computer vision as an adjunct tool for CVS documentation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Gallbladder Hypoplasia With Intestinal Malrotation in a Patient With Apert Syndrome: A Case Report.Case reports in surgery · 2026Article
- Management of Iatrogenic Bile-Duct Injury After Cholecystectomy, 1995-2025: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools Across the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgical Pathway: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Gallbladder agenesis leading to an unnecessary surgery: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying the critical view of safety (CVS) and other safe anatomic landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the cornerstone for avoiding bile duct injuries (BDI). Artificial intelligence (AI), which has infiltrated in the operating room, appears as a promising tool, enabling surgeons to safely dissect during LC. The aim of this study is to investigate the AI models and their performance for identifying these critical structures. A systematic literature review of the PubMed and Google Scholar databases was conducted using medical subject headings (MeSH). Studies presenting the application of AI models for identifying CVS and anatomic landmarks were included and analyzed in terms of performance and reliability. Clinical feasibility trials with preliminary data were separately analyzed. Seventeen studies were found eligible and analyzed for various parameters. Generating AI models for identifying CVS and anatomic landmarks during LC is feasible, while their performance in terms of accuracy, precision and recall has remarkably improved. Regarding their reliability, intersection over union (IoU) and F1/Dice scores have been improved, as well. AI models can be successfully deployed in the operating room, and could assist surgeons in decision-making. Implementation of AI during LC for identifying CVS and important anatomic landmarks appears as a feasible and promising option. Preliminary data are encouraging in terms of performance but still major obstacles and barriers need to be overcome. Whether this will lead to reduced BDIs and enhanced patient safety, requires more well-designed studies. PROSPERO database registration: (UIN: CRD42024557432).
Indexed as
Identifiers
40350500What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.