Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40350491›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2025

Predicting delirium in acute ischemic stroke: the PREDELIS score.

Natalie Berger, Diether Kramer, Michael Schrempf, Edith Hofer, Alexander Pichler, Simon Fandler-Höfler, Melanie Haidegger, Isra Hatab, Martin Heine, Jan Jagiello and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Risk-predicting and screening tools of post-stroke delirium: a narrative review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Natalie BergerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Diether KramerDirectorate Technology and IT, Steiermärkische Krankenanstaltengesellschaft M.B.H., Graz, Austria.
Michael SchrempfDivision of Cardiolody, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Edith HoferDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Alexander PichlerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Simon Fandler-HöflerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Melanie HaideggerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Isra HatabDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Martin HeineDepartment of Neurology, LKH Oststeiermark, Feldbach, Austria.
Jan JagielloDepartment of Neurology, LKH Murtal, Knittelfeld, Austria.
Herbert KollerDepartment of Neurology, LKH Graz II, Graz, Austria.
Stefan LilekDepartment of Neurology, LKH Hochsteiermark, Bruck/Mur, Austria.
Sai VeerankiDirectorate Technology and IT, Steiermärkische Krankenanstaltengesellschaft M.B.H., Graz, Austria.
Christian EnzingerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Thomas GattringerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Markus KneihslDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036, Graz, Austria. markus.kneihsl@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6334-9432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelirium, defined as an acute, fluctuating disturbance in consciousness, attention and cognition, is a common stroke complication and associated with poor functional outcome. Although resource-intensive prevention strategies could reduce delirium rates, their implementation in unselected stroke patients is challenging. This study aimed to develop a risk score for predicting delirium in acute ischemic stroke (PREDELIS).

methodsWe retrospectively included all ischemic stroke patients admitted to five stroke units of Styria, Austria, between 2013 and 2021. Data were retrieved from a comprehensive medical information system using semi-automated data extraction. The PREDELIS score was based on multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify admission variables associated with delirium.

results14,475 acute ischemic stroke patients (median age: 76 years, 46% women) were split in a 40% derivation (n = 6151; delirium = 398, 6.5%) and a 60% validation cohort (n = 8324; delirium: 568, 6.8%). Previous delirium (4 points), chronic alcohol consumption (3), age > 70 years (2), male sex (2), infection (2), admission NIHSS > 7 (1), non-lacunar stroke (1) and vision/hearing impairment (1) were associated with delirium (all p < 0.05) and included in our score (median: 5 points). The score´s area under the curve was 0.72 in both the derivation (95% CI 0.69-0.75) and the validation cohort (95% CI 0.70-0.74). While patients with a score of ≤ 5 had a low delirium risk (2.5%), a score of ≥ 9 indicated a high risk (30.9%). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThis study introduces a novel score for early delirium risk estimation in ischemic stroke patients, aiding clinicians in identifying high-risk individuals for targeted screening and prevention.

Indexed as

DeliriumIschemic StrokeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexAcute ischemic strokeDeliriumPrediction scorePrevention

Identifiers

PMID40350491
PMCPMC12066373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.