Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40350487›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ageing2025

The impact of providing intensive care and practical help in mid-life on employment transitions in Europe.

Jeroen J A Spijker, Maike van Damme, Bruno Arpino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeroen J A SpijkerCentre d'Estudis Demogràfics (CED-CERCA), Bellaterra, Spain. jspijker@ced.uab.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3957-9553
Maike van DammeCentre d'Estudis Demogràfics (CED-CERCA), Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1080-9789
Bruno ArpinoDepartment of Statistical Sciences and Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8374-3066

Funding

Italian Ministry of Research 2022JB2NBNMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación PCI2021-121983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines how caregiving influences employment transitions among employed mid-life adults (50-69 years) who began providing non-professional care on a daily basis to someone inside or outside their household. Using data from the Survey of Health Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) from 2004 to 2017, we apply a difference-in-difference model with propensity score weighting to estimate probabilities of various employment change outcomes for each care status. These outcomes include reducing working hours, exiting the labour market, and retiring. Results are compared to those who continue to work. We assess heterogeneities by gender, income and three empirically identified care regime types from the first article in this special collection: strong defamilialism/supported familialism (strong DF/SF), moderate DF/SF and familialism-by-default (FbD). Results show that overall and for each gender and care regime, retiring is the most likely employment transition for new caregivers. However, low-income persons that make the transition into co-resident care in moderate DF/SF care regime countries are more likely to reduce working hours than non-carers. Regarding labour market exits, no significant overall effect was found. Nonetheless, exit was less likely among men in FbD regime countries when care occurred outside their household. This pattern may reflect financial pressures to stay in employment in contexts of limited state support (hence, an income effect). Women, on the other hand, are less likely to exit in strong DF/SF countries, which might be an income effect in that context. To conclude, caregiving significantly affects employment transitions, with notable differences across gender, income levels, and care regimes. These results underscore the importance of policies that support caregivers-particularly in familialist contexts-by providing affordable formal care options and flexible workplace arrangements to help them remain in employment.

Indexed as

CaregivingCare regimesEmployment transitionsGender differencesMid-life carers

Identifiers

PMID40350487
PMCPMC12066390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.