ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative analysis of different PV technologies under the tropical environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, six different types of solar PV technologies are compared in terms of their performances under tropical conditions, using three years of performance data from a 1.2 MW experimental solar farm. The technologies considered include single-crystalline silicon, polycrystalline silicon, microcrystalline silicon, amorphous silicon, copper indium selenium (CIS), and hetero-junction with intrinsic thin layer (HIT). The field performances of these cells were initially assessed using standard performance indices such as Array Yield, Reference Yield, Capture Loss, Performance Ratio, and Efficiency Ratio. Among the technologies studied, amorphous silicon and HIT-based systems demonstrated better performance, showing higher Performance and Efficiency Ratios, along with lower capture losses. This study also modelled the fluctuations in power production from these panels. Under probabilistic modeling, the ramping behavior of the systems was characterized using the Generalized Logistic Distribution. Based on this analysis, CIS PV systems were found to have minimum power ramps, where as the HIT based systems showed the highest power fluctuations. To predict minute-wise and hourly ramping of the PV systems under varying levels of solar insolation, machine learning methods based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) were developed. With a Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) of over 96%, these models demonstrated high accuracy in capturing the ramping characteristics of the studied PV systems. The results of this study offer valuable insights into the performance of different PV systems under tropical regions, which can be used in efficiently designing and managing solar PV projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.