Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40350477›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative analysis of different PV technologies under the tropical environments.

V Femin, R Veena, M I Petra, S Mathew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

V FeminUniversiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong, BE, 1410, Brunei Darussalam.
R VeenaUniversiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong, BE, 1410, Brunei Darussalam.
M I PetraUniversiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong, BE, 1410, Brunei Darussalam.
S MathewFaculty of Engineering and Science, University of Agder, Jon Lilletunsvei 9, 4879, Grimstad, Norway. sathyajith.mathew@uia.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, six different types of solar PV technologies are compared in terms of their performances under tropical conditions, using three years of performance data from a 1.2 MW experimental solar farm. The technologies considered include single-crystalline silicon, polycrystalline silicon, microcrystalline silicon, amorphous silicon, copper indium selenium (CIS), and hetero-junction with intrinsic thin layer (HIT). The field performances of these cells were initially assessed using standard performance indices such as Array Yield, Reference Yield, Capture Loss, Performance Ratio, and Efficiency Ratio. Among the technologies studied, amorphous silicon and HIT-based systems demonstrated better performance, showing higher Performance and Efficiency Ratios, along with lower capture losses. This study also modelled the fluctuations in power production from these panels. Under probabilistic modeling, the ramping behavior of the systems was characterized using the Generalized Logistic Distribution. Based on this analysis, CIS PV systems were found to have minimum power ramps, where as the HIT based systems showed the highest power fluctuations. To predict minute-wise and hourly ramping of the PV systems under varying levels of solar insolation, machine learning methods based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) were developed. With a Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) of over 96%, these models demonstrated high accuracy in capturing the ramping characteristics of the studied PV systems. The results of this study offer valuable insights into the performance of different PV systems under tropical regions, which can be used in efficiently designing and managing solar PV projects.

Indexed as

ANNArray yieldCapture lossEfficiency ratioGeneralized logistic distributionkNNMachine learningPerformance ratioPower rampsReference yieldSolar energySVM

Identifiers

PMID40350477
PMCPMC12066738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.