ArticleBMC medicine2025
Discovery and validation of a novel dual-target blood test for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma across stages from cirrhosis.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- WT1-AS acts as a tumor suppressor in cervical cancer via OSR2-mediated transcriptional activation.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Deciphering the contribution of 5'-tiRNA- Lys-CTT as an emerging early diagnostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers. Early detection of HCC helps improve the patients' 5-year survival rate. Our goal was to identify superior methylation biomarkers to develop a methylation-specific quantitative PCR (MS‒qPCR) assay.
methodsA five-phase case-control study identified HCC methylation biomarkers via capture sequencing, TCGA/RNA-seq filtering, technical (MS-qPCR/Sanger) and biological (quadruplex MS-qPCR) validation. Methylated biomarkers were selected based on differential methylation expression using a tissue discovery cohort (43 HCC, 32 normal) and validated in plasma validation cohorts (Phase 1: 53 HCC, 52 cirrhosis, 20 benign, 50 healthy; Phase 2: 67 HCC, 81 cirrhosis). Then, the final assay's HCC detection performance was compared with existing blood-based surveillance methods.
resultsTwo methylated genes, OSR2 and TSPYL5, and a novel internal reference gene, SDF4, were identified and developed into an MS‒qPCR assay named Qliver. Qliver had an AUC of 0.955 (95% CI: 0.924-0.987) for distinguishing HCC patients from non-HCC patients in the Phase 1 plasma cohort, with a sensitivity of 88.68% (95% CI: 76.97%-95.73%) and a specificity of 89.34% (95% CI: 82.47%-94.20%), and 0.958 (95% CI: 0.927-0.989) for distinguishing HCC patients from cirrhosis patients in the Phase 2 plasma cohort, with a sensitivity of 88.06% (95% CI: 77.82%-94.70%) and a specificity of 92.59% (95% CI: 84.57%-97.23%). For the Phase 1 plus Plasma 2 cohort, Qliver had an AUC of at least 0.958 for detecting HCC in healthy individuals, cirrhosis patients and patients with benign liver diseases, which was superior to that of the GALAD score (AUC: 0.777 to 0.849). For BCLC stage 0 and A HCC patients, the sensitivity of Qliver ranged from 62.50% (95% CI: 24.49%-91.48%) to 72.73% (39.03%-93.98%), with a specificity of 90%. Overall, Qliver was superior to the AFP, AFP-L3, DCP and the GALAD score in terms of cirrhosis history, tumor stage, tumor size and tumor count.
conclusionsQliver demonstrated superior performance in detecting HCC compared with currently widely used blood biomarkers, suggesting its potential clinical benefit in HCC surveillance in high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.