Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40350437›Full record

ReviewJournal of translational medicine2025

The potential therapeutic approaches targeting gut health in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): a narrative review.

Chou-Yi Hsu, Irfan Ahmad, Rana Warid Maya, Mayada Ahmed Abass, Jitendra Gupta, Abhayveer Singh, Kamal Kant Joshi, J Premkumar, Samir Sahoo, Mohsen Khosravi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chou-Yi HsuThunderbird School of Global Management, Arizona State University, Tempe Campus, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Irfan AhmadDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Rana Warid MayaMazaya University College, Nasiriyah, Iraq.
Mayada Ahmed AbassCollege of Pharmacy, Al-Mustaqbal University, Babylon, Iraq.
Jitendra GuptaInstitute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, Mathura, India.
Abhayveer SinghCentre for Research Impact & Outcome, Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Kamal Kant JoshiDepartment of Allied Science, Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun, India.
J PremkumarDepartment of Biomedical, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Samir SahooDepartment of General Medicine, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to Be University), Bhubaneswar, India.
Mohsen KhosraviDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran. dr_khosravi2016@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2970-6309

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex disorder characterized by persistent fatigue and cognitive impairments, with emerging evidence highlighting the role of gut health in its pathophysiology. The main objective of this review was to synthesize qualitative and quantitative data from research examining the gut microbiota composition, inflammatory markers, and therapeutic outcomes of interventions targeting the microbiome in the context of ME/CFS.

methodsThe data collection involved a detailed search of peer-reviewed English literature from January 1995 to January 2025, focusing on studies related to the microbiome and ME/CFS. This comprehensive search utilized databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, with keywords including "ME/CFS," "Gut-Brain Axis," "Gut Health," "Intestinal Dysbiosis," "Microbiome Dysbiosis," "Pathophysiology," and "Therapeutic Approaches." Where possible, insights from clinical trials and observational studies were included to enrich the findings. A narrative synthesis method was also employed to effectively organize and present these findings.

resultsThe study found notable changes in the gut microbiota diversity and composition in ME/CFS patients, contributing to systemic inflammation and worsening cognitive and physical impairments. As a result, various microbiome interventions like probiotics, prebiotics, specific diets, supplements, fecal microbiota transplantation, pharmacological interventions, improved sleep, and moderate exercise training are potential therapeutic strategies that merit further exploration.

conclusionsInterventions focusing on the gut-brain axis may help reduce neuropsychiatric symptoms in ME/CFS by utilizing the benefits of the microbiome. Therefore, identifying beneficial microbiome elements and incorporating their assessments into clinical practice can enhance patient care through personalized treatments. Due to the complexity of ME/CFS, which involves genetic, environmental, and microbial factors, a multidisciplinary approach is also necessary. Since current research lacks comprehensive insights into how gut health might aid ME/CFS treatment, standardized diagnostics and longitudinal studies could foster innovative therapies, potentially improving quality of life and symptom management for those affected.

Indexed as

Fatigue Syndrome, ChronicGastrointestinal MicrobiomeDysbiosisHumansChronic fatigue syndromeHealthMicrobiome-gut-brain-axisMicrobiota-gut-brain-axisMyalgic encephalomyelitisTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID40350437
PMCPMC12066075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.