Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40350434›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of emergency medicine2025

Stem cell therapy use in patients with dementia: a systematic review.

Olivier Uwishema, Malak Ghezzawi, Magda Wojtara, Ignatius N Esene, Kehinde Obamiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olivier UwishemaDepartment of Research and Education, Oli Health Magazine Organization, Kigali, Rwanda. uwolivier1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0692-9027
Malak GhezzawiDepartment of Research and Education, Oli Health Magazine Organization, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0702-0139
Magda WojtaraDepartment of Research and Education, Oli Health Magazine Organization, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6903-0206
Ignatius N EseneNeurosurgery Division, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bamenda, Bambili, Cameroon.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8785-8875
Kehinde ObamiroJames Cook University Central Queensland Centre for Rural and Remote Health, Emerald, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-1953

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStem cell therapy (SCT) is increasingly recognized for its potential in managing cognitive impairment, particularly that of dementia. The application of SCT aims to restore cognitive functioning in people living with dementia. Beyond pre-clinical studies, several clinical trials have evaluated specific stem cell (SC) types for their efficacy in treating dementia. AIMS &

objectivesTo assess the status and efficacy of pre-clinical and clinical studies utilizing SCs as a therapeutic approach for dementia.

methodsA systematic review was conducted using two electronic databases: MEDLINE and Embase. We reviewed studies on the application of SCs in dementia, focusing on the following aspects: Animal models used in pre-clinical studies, tissue sources of SCs and donor species, and administrative routes and outcome assessments. Included papers comprised randomized control trials (RCTs) and original studies, while those involving adjuvant therapies for dementia were excluded. Quality assessment criteria included relevance to the research question, type of SCs, stage of SC transplantation, duration and route of administration, methods for outcome assessment, and the total number of animals implicated.

resultsA total of 32 papers were included, encompassing 21 clinical trials and 11 preclinical studies. The preclinical studies employed various transgenic animal models to evaluate SCT outcomes. Animal models of dementia, particularly transgenic mice, have proven instrumental in replicating human disease mechanisms. These models facilitate understanding of pathophysiology and preclinical testing of therapeutic interventions. Studies utilizing SCT demonstrated notable improvements in spatial memory, reduced neuroinflammation, and protection against amyloid-beta (Aβ) toxicity. Key mechanisms included modulation of inflammation, microglial immune responses, neurogenesis support, and anti-amyloidogenic effects. Preclinical studies predominantly employed human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells (PD-MSCs), umbilical cord-derived MSCs (U-MSCs), and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neuronal precursors. Administration routes varied, with stereotactic and intravenous injections targeting affected brain regions. Reductions in inflammatory markers such as IL-1β, TNF-α, and increases in anti-inflammatory cytokines like IL-4 and IL-10 were observed. These outcomes emphasize the immunomodulatory and neuroprotective capacities of SCT.

conclusionSCT shows promise in addressing dementia-related pathologies by leveraging diverse therapeutic mechanisms. Continued refinement of preclinical models and translational research is essential to bridge gaps between preclinical findings and clinical applications, potentially paving the way for novel treatments for dementia.

Indexed as

Amyloid-betaDementiaNeuroinflammationPreclinical studiesStem cell therapyTransgenic animal models

Identifiers

PMID40350434
PMCPMC12067764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.