ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Investigation of the influencing factors on subjective evaluation in initial and end-of-day silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Performance and Wearer Experience with Two Contemporary Daily Disposable Silicone Hydrogel Lenses.Clinical optometry · 2026Trial
- Short-Term Residual Myopic Bias Measured by Open-Field Autorefraction After 10-Second Myopic Overcorrection in Young Myopic Adults.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Feasibility, agreement, and time savings of PHANTOM open-field binocular integrated refraction versus conventional clinical refraction in healthy young adults.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the factors influencing subjective ratings of comfort, vision quality, dryness, and satisfaction at both initial and end-of-day wear among young Asian wearers of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
methodsParticipants aged 20 to 24 years who were satisfied wearers of silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses were recruited. Each participant attended two scheduled visits. During the first visit (Day 1), ocular health, refractive error, visual acuity, first and average non-invasive tear break-up time (F-NITBUT and A-NITBUT), and subjective ratings were measured without lenses and 15 min after wearing Somofilcon A daily disposable lenses. On the second visit (Day 7), follow-up data were collected after seven consecutive days of lens wear.
resultsA total of 59 healthy participants (mean age: 20.86 ± 1.29 years) participated in this study. Visual acuity demonstrated a significant negative correlation with comfort, vision quality, and satisfaction after 15 min of Somofilcon A lens wear on Day 1 and a positive correlation with dryness. Additionally, A-NITBUT was significantly positively correlated with vision quality. On Day 7, visual acuity was negatively correlated with overall vision quality after 8 h of wear. However, residual refraction and F-NITBUT showed no significant correlation with comfort, vision quality, dryness, or satisfaction after 15 min of wear on Day 1-8 h on Day 7.
conclusionsThe results suggest that higher visual acuity at initial lens wear was strongly associated with improved subjective comfort, vision quality, and overall satisfaction, as well as reduced dryness. Furthermore, a longer average tear break-up time was associated with improved vision quality. For prolonged lens use, visual acuity was only associated with vision quality. Visual acuity plays a significant role in subjective ratings at the initial lens wear, while tear break-up time may serve as a predictor for subjective vision quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.