ArticleAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2025
Anti-TFAM antibodies link mitochondrial damage with antiphospholipid syndrome and thrombosis in SLE.
Article in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DAMP signaling networks: from receptors to diverse pathophysiological functions.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial DNA in systemic lupus erythematosus: pathogenic mechanisms, clinical biomarkers, and precision therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMitochondria are a source of autoantigens and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Nucleoids carrying TFAM (transcription factor A, mitochondrial) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) are important DAMPs in SLE. While mtDNA has been associated with anti-double-stranded (ds)DNA antibodies and type I interferon (IFN-I), the immunogenic role of TFAM in SLE pathogenesis is unknown. Here, we characterised the clinical and transcriptional phenotypes linked to anti-TFAM antibodies in SLE.
methodsAnti-TFAM antibodies were discovered in an exploratory sample of 22 SLE patients and 9 healthy controls. To define the prevalence, clinical significance, and associations with transcriptional profiles and IFN levels, anti-TFAM antibodies were detected using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 98 healthy controls and 158 SLE patients. Sera from patients with dermatomyositis, rheumatoid arthritis, and primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) were also tested.
resultsAnti-TFAM antibodies were discovered in patients with SLE while analysing neutrophil autoantigens and confirmed by ELISA and immunoblotting. One-third of SLE patients (48/158) were positive for anti-TFAM antibodies. Unlike anti-dsDNA antibodies, anti-TFAM antibodies were not associated with disease activity or the IFN signature. Instead, anti-TFAM antibodies were associated with thrombosis, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) (odds ratio [OR], 2.9 and 5.4, respectively), thrombosis-associated transcriptional profiles, and elevated IFN-III. Anti-TFAM antibodies were also found in PAPS, supporting their role in APS but not SLE pathogenesis. Lupus anticoagulant increased the risk of thrombosis associated with anti-TFAM antibodies (OR, 8.71), indicating they are markers of independent prothrombotic pathways.
conclusionsAnti-TFAM antibodies identify a distinct clinical and transcriptional disease subset associated with mitochondrial damage, thrombosis, and APS in SLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.