ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
Combinatorial treatment with upadacitinib abrogates systemic toxicity of a tumor-targeted IL-2 fusion protein.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does acute inflammation triggered by infection promote cancer progression?PLoS biology · 2026Review
- The JAK1 Inhibitor Upadacitinib Curbs Acute Liver Failure via Suppressing IFN-γ/JAK1/STAT1 and TNF-α/NF-κB/MAPK Pathways and Modulating Bax/Bcl-2 Ratio.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Article
- HosTIL territory: mapping the landscape of toxicity in TIL therapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Review
- CIMT 2025: Report on the 22Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe administration of recombinant interleukin 2 (IL-2) in oncology is frequently hampered by dose-limiting toxicities, including potentially lethal vascular leak syndrome. Antibody-IL-2 fusion proteins capable of preferential tumor localization have shown encouraging signs of activity in clinical trials; however, they typically cause side effects shortly after intravenous administration, which may limit escalation to curative doses. There is an urgent need to engineer IL-2 products with "activity-on-demand" able to mask on-target off-tumor IL-2 activity without compromising therapeutic efficacy.
methodsTo design IL-2 biopharmaceuticals with "activity-on-demand", which would be non-toxic on administration but regain activity at the tumor site, we explored the therapeutic potential of the co-administration of signaling inhibitors with matched pharmacokinetic properties. In this work, we used the tumor-homing F8-IL2 fusion protein, specific to a splice variant of fibronectin, and masked off-tumor toxicity by co-administration of upadacitinib, which rapidly clears from circulation. Vascular leak syndrome was monitored by histopathological analysis, the extent of peripheral edema, and cytokine levels. Immune profiling of the tumors and secondary lymphoid organs was performed by flow cytometry.
resultsIn immunocompetent tumor-bearing mice, the combinatorial treatment significantly improved tolerability without any detectable loss of therapeutic activity, protecting the mice from body weight loss, uncontrolled systemic cytokine release, and severe vascular leak syndrome manifestations, including peripheral edema. F8-IL2 efficiently controlled tumor growth and retained its immunological activity within the neoplastic mass, as evidenced by the massive natural killer and cytotoxic T-cell infiltrates.
conclusionsThis study suggests that combinatorial treatments enable the administration of potentially curative doses of targeted IL-2 products while sparing healthy organs from life-threatening toxicities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.