ArticleBMJ open2025
Use of 3D printed head and neck models for simulating 10 common ENT emergency procedures: a prospective validation study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validating high-fidelity simulation for assessing procedural skills in nursing education: a kane framework approach in Ghana.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to validate a high-fidelity three-dimensional (3D)-printed head and neck model for training emergency medicine (EM) physicians, primary care physicians and allied health professionals in managing 10 common ear, nose and throat (ENT) emergencies.
settingThe study was conducted at an ENT Emergencies course in London. STUDY
designProspective validation study.
participantsAll delegates (n=90) were healthcare professionals. Among them, 60% (n=54) were EM residents/trainees, 28% (n=25) were primary care residents/trainees, 4% (n=4) were ENT residents/trainees, 4% (n=4) were emergency nurse practitioners, 2% (n=2) were primary care attending physicians and 1% (n=1) was an EM attending/consultant. All faculty were consultant ENT surgeons (n=11).
interventionThe 3D models, produced using proprietary 3D printing technology (Fuesetec), were used in a 1-day ENT emergencies course for validating training and confidence of delegates in performing 10 common ENT emergencies.
resultsA total of 86% (n=77) of delegates found the models extremely or very helpful in learning ENT emergencies. Delegates rated the resemblance to real patients as excellent or very good in both haptic feedback (n=58, 64%) and tissue texture (n=67, 74%). Additionally, 74%-96% of delegates felt confident in performing the 10 ENT procedures after using the models.
conclusionsThe 3D models enhanced participant confidence in performing 10 common ENT emergency procedures, demonstrating good face, content and indirect criterion validity. These models could support emergency ENT skill development in local emergency departments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.