ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2025
Cine cardiac magnetic resonance segmentation using temporal-spatial adaptation of prompt-enabled segment-anything-model: a feasibility study.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- EchoFM: Foundation Model for Generalizable Echocardiogram Analysis.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe propose an approach to adapt a segmentation foundation model, segment-anything-model (SAM), for cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) segmentation and evaluate its generalization performance on unseen datasets.
methodsWe present our model, cineCMR-SAM, which introduces a temporal-spatial attention mechanism to produce segmentation across one cardiac cycle. We freeze the pre-trained SAM's weights to leverage SAM's generalizability while fine-tuning the rest of the model on two public cine CMR datasets. Our model also enables text prompts to specify the view type (short-axis or long-axis) of the input slices and box prompts to guide the segmentation region. We evaluated our model's generalization performance on three external testing datasets including a public multi-center, multi-vendor testing dataset of 136 cases and 2 retrospectively collected in-house datasets from 2 different centers with specific pathologies: aortic stenosis (40 cases) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (53 cases).
resultsOur approach achieved superior generalization in both the public testing dataset (Dice for LV=0.94 and for myocardium=0.86) and two in-house datasets (Dice ≥0.90 for LV and ≥0.82 for myocardium) compared to existing CMR deep learning segmentation methods. Clinical parameters derived from automatic and manual segmentations showed a strong correlation (r ≥0.90). The use of both text prompts and box prompts enhanced the segmentation accuracy.
conclusioncineCMR-SAM effectively adapts SAM for cine CMR segmentation, achieving high generalizability and superior accuracy on unseen datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.