Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40349496›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025

Intrauterine device migration into the bladder with urolithiasis: A case report.

Yassine Jaziri, Bilel Saidani, Ahmed Saadi, Ayed Haroun, Marouene Chakroun, Riadh Ben Slama

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yassine JaziriThe Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia; The Department of Urology, Charles Nicole Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia. Electronic address: yassinejaziri1998@gmail.com.
Bilel SaidaniThe Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia; The Department of Urology, Charles Nicole Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Ahmed SaadiThe Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia; The Department of Urology, Charles Nicole Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Ayed HarounThe Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia; The Department of Urology, Charles Nicole Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Marouene ChakrounThe Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia; The Department of Urology, Charles Nicole Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Riadh Ben SlamaThe Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia; The Department of Urology, Charles Nicole Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntrauterine devices (IUDs) are the contraceptive method of choice for many women across the globe. Extrauterine migration of IUDs is a rare complication, with the intravesical location and vesical stone formation being an exceptional event. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 39-year-old woman with a history of IUD insertion four years prior to the onset of lower urinary tract symptoms consisting mainly of dysuria and pollakiuria. A migrated device was discovered in the bladder, resulting in stone formation. The bladder stone was successfully treated using laser lithotripsy with an uncomplicated recovery and the resolution of all symptoms at further check-up. DISCUSSION: IUD intravesical migration with stone formation around the device is a rare but noteworthy complication of the contraceptive method, especially in the context of recurring urinary tract symptoms. Ultrasonography and standard radiography can be helpful tools in diagnosing device migration. Treatment options can differ, with laser lithotripsy being a minimally invasive and efficient method to treat the resulting calculus around the migrated device and for device extraction. Post-operative follow-up should focus on symptom resolution as well as the presence of fistulae.

conclusionWhile IUDs remain an efficient and accessible method of contraception, complications including device migration into the bladder with or without stone formation should be considered, particularly in the context of recurring lower urinary tract symptoms, and should be treated immediately to avoid further complications.

Indexed as

Bladder stonesCase reportCystolithiasisIntrauterine device migration

Identifiers

PMID40349496
PMCPMC12139510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.