ReviewThe Journal of physiology2026
The ageing brain: Cortical overactivation - How does it evolve?
Review in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved subjective sleep quality in older adults by enhancing the GABAergic system in the sensorimotor cortex.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Spectral dynamic causal modeling of effective connectivity across multiple brain networks in pilot trainees.iScience · 2026Article
- Functional and structural connectome-based predictive modelling of balance in elderly adults.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prefrontal cortex connectivity during right and left hand dexterity tests in younger and older adults.PloS one · 2026Article
- Theta Cordance Decline in Frontal and Temporal Cortices: Longitudinal Evidence of Regional Cortical Aging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is overwhelming evidence for an age-related change in brain activity when performing motor and motor-cognitive tasks (i.e. dual-tasking). In general this research shows increased cortical activity, i.e. cortical overactivation, and, less evident, subcortical deactivation in the healthy brains of older compared to young adults. Furthermore brain network activity becomes less distinct and less segregated. Interestingly from a behavioural point of view some of these adaptations seem helpful, leading to better motor performances than in age-matched seniors, but others are related to inferior performance. Current theories try to explain these findings, therefore, either in favour of compensatory strategies or in terms of non-selective, inefficient (dedifferentiated) brain activation. However the limitation of current theories is that they are 'static', considering only one point in time instead of age-related progression of brain activity over time. In contrast this review article proposes a developmental process, from compensation to negative overcompensation to chronic maladaptive overcompensation, which leads to dedifferentiation and desegregation. In addition this article highlights that elderly subjects utilize motor control strategies, such as increased cortical activity, down-regulation of inhibitory processes and less-segregated and lateralized brain activation patterns, that are also commonly found in healthy young adults when task challenges increase. Thus many findings about differences in brain activation may result from the fact that although 'absolute task difficulty' remains the same, 'relative task difficulty' increases for the older subjects, forcing them to apply the above-mentioned neural activation strategies. This initially compensatory strategy can, however, turn into non-efficient brain activation over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.