ArticleCommunity health equity research & policy2026
En Route to Midwifery Professionalisation: Contextualising Midwifery Care in the Indian Public Health System.
Article in Community health equity research & policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundThe 'Guidelines on Midwifery Services Initiative, 2018' introduces the Nurse Practitioner in Midwifery (NPM) cadre to improve maternal mortality rates, quality of care, and reduce overmedicalisation in the Indian public health system. The paper examines how the NPM cadre is envisioned in the guidelines, positioned within the medical hierarchy, and aligned within the existing maternal health context. It also looks at how existing midwives and midwifery advocates perceive the changes introduced and the accompanying professionalisation process.MethodologyThe study employed two methods: (a) qualitative document analysis (QDA) of the midwifery guidelines and (b) semi-structured in-depth interviews with 14 nurse-midwifery leaders and advocates.FindingsThe QDA uncovers the underlying themes of task shifting and institutional deliveries as dominant, discussions on professional autonomy and primary health care receiving less importance and even less reflection on the history of midwifery in India. The interview findings highlight (a) tensions around carving out a separate profession, (b) the implications of midwifery at the primary healthcare level and (c) the need for an enabling environment for midwives. This paper reveals how the guidelines frame midwifery as a cost-effective, specialised nursing care within the institutional delivery framework and distanced from its traditional connotations.DiscussionIt elucidates tensions around autonomous midwifery involving professional boundaries, negotiations with medical professionals, institutional perceptions, and historical stereotypes. It builds on the broader literature on 'professions' in sociology by identifying aspects of 'professional boundary work' embedded in policy documents and experiences of participants - thereby unpacking the midwifery professionalisation process in the Indian context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.