Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40349294›Full record

ArticleOdontology2026

Selenium anion substitution in hydroxyapatite: chemo-mechanical effects compared with root canal dentin.

Mohammad Ali Saghiri, Maziar Farhadi, Elham Samadi, Mina Shekarian, Salvatore Napoli, Steven M Morgano

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammad Ali SaghiriDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark, NJ, USA. saghiri@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5064-7828
Maziar FarhadiIndependent Researcher, Tehran, Iran.
Elham SamadiDentin Vaccine LLC, Lyndhurst, NJ, USA.
Mina ShekarianDentin Vaccine LLC, Lyndhurst, NJ, USA.
Salvatore NapoliDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark, NJ, USA.
Steven M MorganoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark, NJ, USA.

Funding

Division of Materials Research 2312680 &2321456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the effect of selenium substitution on the chemical and mechanical properties of synthesized hydroxyapatite and compare them with natural dentin. Additionally, this study aimed to compare the properties of synthetic and natural hydroxyapatite to determine if laboratory-synthesized hydroxyapatite could serve as a viable substitute for natural hydroxyapatite. Four groups were analyzed: natural dentin (ND-treated and ND-untreated) and synthetic hydroxyapatite (SD-Treated and SD-untreated), each with 10 samples. Samples were exposed to selenium acid for 2, 5, and 10 min, with saline as a control. Selenium content was measured using ICP-MS, and Vickers microhardness testing was performed. Solubility was assessed in 0.1 M butyric acid (pH 4.4) for 24 h at 37 °C with 100% humidity. Selenium concentrations were significantly higher in ND-treated subgroups than in SD-treated subgroups (P < 0.05), mirroring trends observed in surface microhardness. ND-treated groups also exhibited significantly lower solubility compared to other groups. The results suggest a correlation between selenium levels and dentin's mechanical properties. However, synthesized hydroxyapatite may not be an ideal in vitro model for evaluating dentin fortification.

Indexed as

Dental Pulp CavityDentinDurapatiteSeleniumHardnessHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaterials TestingSolubilityDurapatiteSeleniumChemo-mechanical propertiesDentinIn vitro modelRoot canalSelenium substitutionSynthetic hydroxyapatite

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.