ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Accuracy of a novel, automated 2D-3D registration software for measuring cup position in total hip arthroplasty.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluated the accuracy of an automated 2D-3D registration software for matching preoperative 3D models of the pelvis and acetabular component to intraoperative 2D fluoroscopy images in total hip arthroplasty (THA).
methodsWe developed a 2D-3D registration software that registers a 3D model of the pelvis from preoperative CT and a 3D model of the acetabular implant to intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, thereby calculating the implant position relative to the 3D pelvic reference frame. A total of 145 datasets were used including 65 digitally reconstructed radiographs, 20 dry bone phantoms datasets and 60 clinical datasets with preoperative CT and intraoperative fluoroscopy imaging. Achieved acetabular positions from the clinical images were determined from post-operative CT using a 3D/3D registration method. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the calculated acetabular position from the 2D-3D software to the ground truth data.
resultsMean absolute difference between ground truth and the 2D-3D software was 1.9° [signed error range: -4.4, 4.8] for inclination, 1.5° [-7.3, 4.1] for anteversion, 1.6 mm [-5, 3.8] for cup height and 1.8 mm [-7.3, 4.1] for depth across all datasets. In total, 100% of inclination results and 98% of anteversion results were within 5° while 90% of height and 81% of depth results were within 3 mm.
conclusionWe validated the accuracy of an automated 2D-3D registration software for use in THA. While our method requires preoperative data from CT, the results are comparable to robotics and image-based navigation, and present a promising, simple technology that can be easily integrated into an operating room for THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40349280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.