ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2025
Random forest-based model for the recurrence prediction of borderline ovarian tumor: clinical development and validation.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based early survival prediction in early-onset hepatocellular carcinoma: a SEER-based multi-model comparative study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning model for predicting 5-Year postoperative recurrence risk in patients with stage III colon cancer using preoperative laboratory tests: a two-centre study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Fertility-Sparing Management in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to develop an effective machine learning (ML)-based predictive model for the recurrence of borderline ovarian tumor (BOT), and provide the guidelines of accurate clinical diagnosis and precise treatment for patients.
methodA total of 660 patients diagnosed with BOT were included in this study. Statistical testing methods were employed to identify the most influential factors. At the same time, five machine learning-based models-random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), gradient boosting (GB), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and support vector machine (SVM)-were utilized to construct recurrence prediction models. Model validity was assessed using five metrics: area under the curve (AUC), positive predictive value (PPV), accuracy (ACC), recall (REC), specificity (SPE), and the optimal model was selected based on these performance metrics. The calibration curve further illustrates the reliability of the model. Then, the optimal ML-based model determined the importance of features using SHAP values. Additionally, CIC and DCA, along with recurrence-free survival analysis, were employed to further assess the clinical value of the optimal model.
resultsThe RF model demonstrated superior predictive performance. Additionally, the SHAP analysis of the RF-based model provides the key clinical factors associated with the recurrence of BOT. Furthermore, the DCA and CIC shows the clinical application value of the RF-based model. Moreover, random forest-recurrence free survival (rf-RFS) model validate the effectiveness of the proposed method personalized treatment strategies and informed clinical decision-making of the recurrence of BOT.
conclusionThe RF-based model offers an effective tool for predicting BOT recurrence, with a user-friendly web-based calculator developed to aid clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.