Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40349167›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2025

Chromosomal capture of beneficial genes drives plasmids toward ecological redundancy.

R Craig MacLean, Cédric Lood, Rachel M Wheatley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The extended mobility of plasmids.Nucleic acids research · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R Craig MacLeanUniversity of Oxford, Department of Biology, 11a Mansfield Rd., Oxford OX1 3SZ, United Kingdom.
Cédric LoodUniversity of Oxford, Department of Biology, 11a Mansfield Rd., Oxford OX1 3SZ, United Kingdom.
Rachel M WheatleySchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5DL, United Kingdom.

Funding

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Postdoctoral FellowshipOkinawa Institute of Science and TechnologyTheoretical Sciences Visiting ProgramUKRI Frontiers EP/Y031067/1UKRI Horizon Europe Guarantee program EP/Y029585/1Vice-Chancellor's Illuminate Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasmids are a ubiquitous feature of bacterial genomes, but the forces driving genes and phenotypes to become associated with plasmids are poorly understood. To address this problem, we compared the fitness effects of chromosomal and plasmid genes in the plant symbiont Rhizobium leguminosarum. The relative abundance of beneficial genes on plasmids was very low compared to the chromosome across niches that reflect key steps in plant colonization. Two lines of evidence support the hypothesis that this pattern emerges because evolutionary processes drive beneficial genes to move from plasmids to the bacterial chromosome. First, weakly beneficial genes that increased fitness in a single niche were evenly distributed between plasmids and the chromosome, whereas the chromosome was enriched for strongly beneficial genes that increased fitness across multiple niches. Second, beneficial genes were more prevalent on recently acquired plasmids compared to ancient plasmids. Our findings support a model in which bacterial lineages initially acquire plasmids due to the beneficial genes that they carry, but the movement of beneficial genes to the chromosome gradually erodes the ecological value of plasmids. These findings reconcile existing models of plasmids and highlight the challenge of understanding how plasmids can persist over the long term.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, BacterialGenes, BacterialPlasmidsRhizobium leguminosarumEvolution, MolecularGenetic FitnessGenome, BacterialSymbiosisbacterial evolutionfitnessplasmid paradoxRhizobiumTn-seq

Identifiers

PMID40349167
PMCPMC12221292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.