Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40349114›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced nursing2026

Operationalising Anti-Oppression in Doctoral Nursing Education.

Katerina Melino, Samantha Louie-Poon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katerina MelinoSchool of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0277-2672
Samantha Louie-PoonFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsOutline the rationale, experiences and vision for a progressive pedagogy in nursing doctoral education that embraces collaboration and collective world-building as strategies for developing liberatory knowledge.

designConceptual exploration and vision statement grounded in the pedagogical theories of hooks and Freire.

methodsTheoretical analysis of emancipatory pedagogies, review of existing literature on collaboration in doctoral programs and a reflective account. The framework proposed is informed by bell hooks' engaged pedagogy and Freire's critical pedagogy.

resultsThe paper identifies the limitations of traditional, individualistic approaches in doctoral nursing programs and proposes a re-envisioned pedagogical framework that emphasises community and collective inquiry.

conclusionThe proposed progressive pedagogy for doctoral nursing education seeks to operationalise anti-oppression and decolonisation by fostering a collaborative and community-based approach to knowledge production. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Implementing this progressive pedagogical framework in doctoral nursing education can lead to the development of researchers who are better equipped to address social problems such as racism, oppression and health inequity. REPORTING

methodEQUATOR guidelines are not applicable. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, GraduateCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleanti‐oppressioncollaborationcollective inquirycommunity buildingdoctoral educationengaged pedagogynursing education

Identifiers

PMID40349114
PMCPMC13069212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.