Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40349054›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

"Evaluating the effectiveness of the Saudi laboratory specialist licensure examination preparation program for the medical laboratory sciences interns: a quasi-experimental study".

Ahd A Mansour, Enas Gouda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahd A MansourMedical Laboratory Sciences Department, MLS Program, Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences, Jeddah, 21461, Saudi Arabia.
Enas GoudaMedical Education Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt. enasgoudaa@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Medical Laboratory Science (MLS), passing licensure examinations is essential to demonstrate professional competence worldwide. The Saudi Laboratory Licensing Examination (SLLE) is required by the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) in Saudi Arabia. Success in the SLLE reflects candidates' proficiency in applying their knowledge and skills, serving as an indicator for evaluating the quality of MLS programs. Although preparation strategies for different healthcare licensure exams have been explored, a significant lack of research focuses on SLLE preparation programs for MLS students in Saudi Arabia. This gap became particularly evident when the MLS program at Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences (FCMS) observed a decline in first-attempt SLLE scores for students who graduated in the academic year 2021-2022. To address this research gap and the practical need for improved SLLE performance, this study aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate an SLLE preparation program for MLS interns at FCMS. This program is intended to equip interns with the essential knowledge and skills needed to enhance their chances of success in the SLLE and ensure their readiness for future careers. METHODOLOGY: A quasi-experimental study was conducted from 2022 to 2023 over six weeks at FCMS in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The study included all 18 MLS interns enrolled in the academic year 2022-2023, utilizing total population sampling. The participants were final-year students in their internship phase. The SLLE preparation program adhered to a structured three-phase conceptual framework: pre-training (planning), training (implementation), and post-training (evaluation). Data were collected through researcher-developed questionnaires adapted from previous studies and reviewed for content validity by medical education experts at FCMS. Reliability was ensured through expert review. Interns' knowledge was assessed with pre- and post-tests. A paired samples t-test was employed to analyze differences between pre- and post-test scores. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 28, and statistical significance was established at p < 0.05.

findingsThe study included 18 MLS interns (14 females and 4 males). Level 1 (Reaction): Interns reported high satisfaction with all sessions, with ratings ranging from 94% to 100%. Level 2 (Learning): A significant improvement was observed in post-test scores across all subject areas compared to pre-test scores (p < 0.05). Level 3 (Behavior): Preceptors rated interns' clinical performance highly, achieving an average score of 4.6 out of 5.0, indicating successful application of knowledge in clinical settings. Level 4 (Results): All interns (100%) passed the SLLE on their first attempt one year after completing the program. Qualitative feedback further supported these findings, highlighting strengths in content delivery and instructional strategies.

conclusionIncorporating the SLLE preparation program, along with mock assessments similar to the licensure examinations in the MLS program, enhanced their knowledge and skills, positively impacting interns' performance on the actual SLLE during their first attempt.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementInternship and ResidencyLicensureMedical Laboratory PersonnelFemaleHumansLicensure, MedicalMaleProgram EvaluationSaudi ArabiaInternsMedical laboratory sciencesSaudi commission for health specialtiesSaudi laboratory licensure examination

Identifiers

PMID40349054
PMCPMC12065263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.