ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2025
Psychopharmacological interventions among people who use Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) - a scoping review.
Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Placental and fetal consequences of maternal selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use: current evidence and unresolved questions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne in six people experience infertility, often leading couples to seek Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), which can be emotionally taxing. Anxiety and depression are common among individuals undergoing ART, highlighting the need for integrated mental health support, especially for women who face heightened risk of psychiatric disorders during their reproductive years. Despite the importance of psychiatric care, there is limited knowledge regarding the use of psychiatric medications among individuals undergoing ART.
methodsFollowing a pre-written protocol (osf.io/egxw8/), we systematically searched electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Scopus) up to 15.02.2025 to identify any study focused on psychopharmacotherapy among people undergoing ART. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, performed data extraction, and resolved conflicts through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer. We synthesized data using descriptive analysis and performed analysis within the following subgroups: (1) group of medication according to Neuroscience-based Nomenclature (NbN) classes; (2) indication for using a specific medication (psychiatric / non-psychiatric).
resultsWe included 29 studies published in 31 papers. Psychiatric medications were primarily administered for the treatment of depression (n=12/29 studies, 41.38%) and anxiety disorders (n=8/29, 27.59%). Among all groups of medication serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most commonly studied class of medications (n=15/29 studies, 51.72%), with fluoxetine being the most frequently used medication (n=8/29, 27.59%). Among medications for anxiety, GABA Positive Allosteric Modulators with midazolam occurred the most frequently (n=6/29, 20.69%). Medications for psychosis included single drugs: olanzapine, clozapine, risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole, haloperidol, and promethazine. Among medications that could be used in bipolar disorder there were: valproic acid, lithium, and lamotrigine. The most commonly reported endpoints in the studies were psychiatric symptom severity (n=11/29, 37.93%) and ART efficacy (n=10/29, 34.48%).
conclusionEvidence on the use of psychopharmacotherapy in ART primarily concerns women. Available literature indicates that psychopharmacotherapy for individuals undergoing ART frequently involves medications commonly used in general psychiatric practice, with a tendency toward lower dosing and a preference for serotonin reuptake inhibitors. However, this observation should be interpreted cautiously, as current evidence remains limited and further research is warranted to establish treatment patterns more conclusively. The variability in study designs and reporting standards further highlights the need for standardized methodologies and improved adherence to reporting guidelines to enhance the quality and applicability of future research.
trial registrationReview registration number: osf.io/egxw8/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.