ArticleBMC medical education2025
Enhancing medical education in Nepal through problem-based learning (PBL) and collaborative action research strategies.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of Medical Students' Motivation: Insights into the Development of Future Health Professionals.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Presence and Nature of AI-Use Disclosure Statements in Medical Education Journals: A Bibliometric Study.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTeamwork and collaboration among students are essential for successful problem-based learning (PBL) implementation; however, many medical colleges in Nepal face obstacles to implementing successful PBL sessions. This action research explored elements affecting teamwork during PBL sessions at Lumbini Medical College in Nepal and developed interventions that could readily be applied to enhance student collaboration.
methodsThe study employed qualitative methods, collecting data through online open-ended questionnaires from second-year and first-year medical students. Initial data from second-year students identified teamwork challenges, while feedback from first-year students evaluated interventions. Specific interventions were implemented with first-year students, including improved internet connectivity, systematic textbook availability in PBL rooms, structured presentation formats (PechaKucha), and clear role assignments, as second-year students had completed their preclinical phase. The effectiveness of these interventions was evaluated through first-year students' feedback.
resultsThematic analysis revealed three key challenges: communication barriers (including language and technical issues), discrepancies in participation, and differing levels of preparation. Positive feedback from first-year students confirmed that the implemented interventions were successful in improving team dynamics, facilitating more active participation, and enhancing resource utilization.
conclusionsSuccessful implementation of PBL necessitates not only infrastructural support (internet and access to the resources needed to learn) but also pedagogical structure (e.g. clearly defined roles within groups, systematic structures of participation). These findings offer practical guidance for medical educators seeking to enhance PBL effectiveness, particularly in resource-limited settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.